Intraoperative electrocardiogram monitoring induced bispectral index interference – A misleading heart–mind connection

A. Pahade, Ashita Mowar, Vishwadeepak Singh, Urvashi Kharayat
{"title":"Intraoperative electrocardiogram monitoring induced bispectral index interference – A misleading heart–mind connection","authors":"A. Pahade, Ashita Mowar, Vishwadeepak Singh, Urvashi Kharayat","doi":"10.4103/jica.jica_24_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bi-spectral index (BIS) is a common but an important tool in anaesthesiologist's armamentarium across the world which helps to assess the level of sedation and effect of hypnotic drugs. A value between 40-60 in BIS is considered as optimal level of sedation during general anaesthesia. However, numerous factors can interfere with accurate BIS value. Electrocardiogram (ECG), has been mentioned as a factor resulting into fallacious BIS values in the literature, which may have significant implications on appropriate dosage of hypnotic drugs. ECG inferences are usually filtered by proprietary algorithm of BIS, and few cases have been documented wherein ECG interference resulted in fallacious BIS readings. Our case reports a less frequently reported interference in BIS values by ECG, which resulted into lower BIS values.","PeriodicalId":361779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian College of Anaesthesiologists","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian College of Anaesthesiologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jica.jica_24_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bi-spectral index (BIS) is a common but an important tool in anaesthesiologist's armamentarium across the world which helps to assess the level of sedation and effect of hypnotic drugs. A value between 40-60 in BIS is considered as optimal level of sedation during general anaesthesia. However, numerous factors can interfere with accurate BIS value. Electrocardiogram (ECG), has been mentioned as a factor resulting into fallacious BIS values in the literature, which may have significant implications on appropriate dosage of hypnotic drugs. ECG inferences are usually filtered by proprietary algorithm of BIS, and few cases have been documented wherein ECG interference resulted in fallacious BIS readings. Our case reports a less frequently reported interference in BIS values by ECG, which resulted into lower BIS values.
术中心电图监测诱导的双谱指数干扰-一种误导的心-脑连接
双谱指数(BIS)是世界麻醉科常用但重要的仪器,用于评估麻醉药物的镇静水平和催眠效果。在全身麻醉时,BIS值在40-60之间被认为是最佳镇静水平。然而,许多因素会干扰准确的BIS值。在文献中,心电图(ECG)被认为是导致BIS值错误的一个因素,这可能对催眠药物的适当剂量有重要影响。心电推断通常由BIS专有算法过滤,并且很少有记录的病例,其中心电干扰导致错误的BIS读数。我们的病例报告了较少报道的心电图对BIS值的干扰,导致BIS值降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信