Consideration of cross-validation in estimating objective scores of answer statements posted at Q&A sites

Yuya Yokoyama, T. Hochin, Hiroki Nomiya
{"title":"Consideration of cross-validation in estimating objective scores of answer statements posted at Q&A sites","authors":"Yuya Yokoyama, T. Hochin, Hiroki Nomiya","doi":"10.1109/SNPD.2014.6888719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To eliminate mismatches between the intentions of questioners and respondents of Question and Answer (Q&A) sites, we have clarified that the impression of the statements could be captured by nine factors, and the factor scores could be estimated from the feature values of the statements. Objective scores of the statements could be estimated fairly good, and that those of subjective statements could be estimated well by taking the natural logarithm of the factor scores. This result, however, is likely to estimate inaccurate values due to overfitting to the explanatory variables. This could result from not having considering cross-validation through the attempts. This paper tries to perform multiple regression analysis with the consideration of cross-validation. For statements of Yahoo! Auction, PC and love counseling & human relationships, respective five trials have been attempted. As a result, most of the attempts show good or fairly good estimation accuracy. It is suggested that estimation errors should be reduced.","PeriodicalId":272932,"journal":{"name":"15th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"15th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SNPD.2014.6888719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To eliminate mismatches between the intentions of questioners and respondents of Question and Answer (Q&A) sites, we have clarified that the impression of the statements could be captured by nine factors, and the factor scores could be estimated from the feature values of the statements. Objective scores of the statements could be estimated fairly good, and that those of subjective statements could be estimated well by taking the natural logarithm of the factor scores. This result, however, is likely to estimate inaccurate values due to overfitting to the explanatory variables. This could result from not having considering cross-validation through the attempts. This paper tries to perform multiple regression analysis with the consideration of cross-validation. For statements of Yahoo! Auction, PC and love counseling & human relationships, respective five trials have been attempted. As a result, most of the attempts show good or fairly good estimation accuracy. It is suggested that estimation errors should be reduced.
在评估问答网站上发布的答案陈述的客观分数时考虑交叉验证
为了消除问答(Q&A)网站提问者和被调查者意图之间的不匹配,我们澄清了陈述的印象可以被九个因素捕获,并且可以从陈述的特征值估计因子得分。客观命题的得分可以较好地估计,主观命题的得分可以通过对因子得分取自然对数来估计。然而,由于对解释变量的过度拟合,该结果可能估计不准确的值。这可能是由于没有考虑通过尝试进行交叉验证。本文尝试在交叉验证的情况下进行多元回归分析。雅虎的声明拍卖、PC和爱情咨询与人际关系,分别进行了五种尝试。因此,大多数尝试显示出良好或相当好的估计精度。建议减小估计误差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信