{"title":"LGBTI Rights and the 2017 German National Election","authors":"Louise K. Davidson-Schmich","doi":"10.3167/GPS.2018.360203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the 2017 German national election through\nthe lens of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) interests. It\ndepicts the ways in which sexual minorities articulated their policy preferences,\nthe degree to which these positions were taken up in party platforms\nand electoral discourse, and the extent to which the resulting coalition agreement\npledged to address queer citizens’ concerns. I argue that, as a result of\nwhat Sarah Childs and Mona Lena Krook call a critical actor, this election\nprovided sexual minorities with a high degree of responsiveness on one core\nissue: marriage equality. Other issues of interest to LGBTI voters, however,\nremained largely invisible. The conclusions here are based on analysis of primary\ndocuments including interest group statements, party platforms, and\ncoalition agreements, as well as on German-language news coverage of the\nelection campaign.","PeriodicalId":128145,"journal":{"name":"Twilight of the Merkel Era","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twilight of the Merkel Era","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/GPS.2018.360203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
This article examines the 2017 German national election through
the lens of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) interests. It
depicts the ways in which sexual minorities articulated their policy preferences,
the degree to which these positions were taken up in party platforms
and electoral discourse, and the extent to which the resulting coalition agreement
pledged to address queer citizens’ concerns. I argue that, as a result of
what Sarah Childs and Mona Lena Krook call a critical actor, this election
provided sexual minorities with a high degree of responsiveness on one core
issue: marriage equality. Other issues of interest to LGBTI voters, however,
remained largely invisible. The conclusions here are based on analysis of primary
documents including interest group statements, party platforms, and
coalition agreements, as well as on German-language news coverage of the
election campaign.
本文通过女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人和双性人(LGBTI)的利益来审视2017年德国大选。它描述了性少数群体表达其政策偏好的方式,这些立场在政党纲领和选举话语中被采纳的程度,以及由此产生的联合协议在多大程度上承诺解决酷儿公民的担忧。我认为,由于萨拉·蔡尔兹(Sarah Childs)和莫娜·莉娜·克鲁克(Mona Lena Krook)所说的“关键演员”,这次选举为性少数群体在一个核心问题上提供了高度的回应:婚姻平等。然而,LGBTI选民感兴趣的其他问题在很大程度上仍然是隐形的。本文的结论是基于对主要文件的分析,包括利益集团声明、政党纲领和联盟协议,以及对选举活动的德语新闻报道。