LGBTI Rights and the 2017 German National Election

Louise K. Davidson-Schmich
{"title":"LGBTI Rights and the 2017 German National Election","authors":"Louise K. Davidson-Schmich","doi":"10.3167/GPS.2018.360203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the 2017 German national election through\nthe lens of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) interests. It\ndepicts the ways in which sexual minorities articulated their policy preferences,\nthe degree to which these positions were taken up in party platforms\nand electoral discourse, and the extent to which the resulting coalition agreement\npledged to address queer citizens’ concerns. I argue that, as a result of\nwhat Sarah Childs and Mona Lena Krook call a critical actor, this election\nprovided sexual minorities with a high degree of responsiveness on one core\nissue: marriage equality. Other issues of interest to LGBTI voters, however,\nremained largely invisible. The conclusions here are based on analysis of primary\ndocuments including interest group statements, party platforms, and\ncoalition agreements, as well as on German-language news coverage of the\nelection campaign.","PeriodicalId":128145,"journal":{"name":"Twilight of the Merkel Era","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twilight of the Merkel Era","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/GPS.2018.360203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This article examines the 2017 German national election through the lens of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex (LGBTI) interests. It depicts the ways in which sexual minorities articulated their policy preferences, the degree to which these positions were taken up in party platforms and electoral discourse, and the extent to which the resulting coalition agreement pledged to address queer citizens’ concerns. I argue that, as a result of what Sarah Childs and Mona Lena Krook call a critical actor, this election provided sexual minorities with a high degree of responsiveness on one core issue: marriage equality. Other issues of interest to LGBTI voters, however, remained largely invisible. The conclusions here are based on analysis of primary documents including interest group statements, party platforms, and coalition agreements, as well as on German-language news coverage of the election campaign.
LGBTI权利与2017年德国大选
本文通过女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人和双性人(LGBTI)的利益来审视2017年德国大选。它描述了性少数群体表达其政策偏好的方式,这些立场在政党纲领和选举话语中被采纳的程度,以及由此产生的联合协议在多大程度上承诺解决酷儿公民的担忧。我认为,由于萨拉·蔡尔兹(Sarah Childs)和莫娜·莉娜·克鲁克(Mona Lena Krook)所说的“关键演员”,这次选举为性少数群体在一个核心问题上提供了高度的回应:婚姻平等。然而,LGBTI选民感兴趣的其他问题在很大程度上仍然是隐形的。本文的结论是基于对主要文件的分析,包括利益集团声明、政党纲领和联盟协议,以及对选举活动的德语新闻报道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信