The Effect of Issuer Conservatism on IPO Pricing and Performance

Stephen P. Ferris, Grace Qing Hao, M. Liao
{"title":"The Effect of Issuer Conservatism on IPO Pricing and Performance","authors":"Stephen P. Ferris, Grace Qing Hao, M. Liao","doi":"10.1093/ROF/RFS018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on a textual analysis of initial public offering (IPO) prospectuses, we obtain a number of important findings regarding the relation between the conservatism in prospectuses, IPO pricing, and subsequent operating and stock return performance. First, prospectus conservatism is positively related to underpricing, with the relation more pronounced for technology than nontechnology firms. Second, for nontechnology IPOs, prospectus conservatism is able to predict the firm's post-IPO operating performance. Specifically, we find that conservatism is inversely related to the firm's operating performance for the 3 years following the IPO. However, this predictability is limited to nontechnology IPOs. Finally, we find some evidence that for nontechnology IPOs conservatism is inversely related to the firm's post-IPO abnormal stock return. We conclude that the conservatism contained in an IPO's prospectus contains useful information about pricing and subsequent operating and stock return performance. Moreover, prospectus conservatism for nontechnology IPOs deserves more attention from investors. Copyright 2013, Oxford University Press.","PeriodicalId":445238,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) (Sub-Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"121","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ROF/RFS018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 121

Abstract

Based on a textual analysis of initial public offering (IPO) prospectuses, we obtain a number of important findings regarding the relation between the conservatism in prospectuses, IPO pricing, and subsequent operating and stock return performance. First, prospectus conservatism is positively related to underpricing, with the relation more pronounced for technology than nontechnology firms. Second, for nontechnology IPOs, prospectus conservatism is able to predict the firm's post-IPO operating performance. Specifically, we find that conservatism is inversely related to the firm's operating performance for the 3 years following the IPO. However, this predictability is limited to nontechnology IPOs. Finally, we find some evidence that for nontechnology IPOs conservatism is inversely related to the firm's post-IPO abnormal stock return. We conclude that the conservatism contained in an IPO's prospectus contains useful information about pricing and subsequent operating and stock return performance. Moreover, prospectus conservatism for nontechnology IPOs deserves more attention from investors. Copyright 2013, Oxford University Press.
发行人稳健性对IPO定价和业绩的影响
本文通过对首次公开发行招股说明书的文本分析,得出了招股说明书稳健性、IPO定价、后续经营业绩和股票收益表现之间关系的一些重要发现。首先,招股说明书保守性与定价过低呈正相关,科技类公司的这种关系比非科技类公司更为明显。其次,对于非技术类ipo,招股说明书保守性能够预测公司ipo后的经营业绩。具体而言,我们发现保守性与公司IPO后3年的经营业绩呈负相关。然而,这种可预测性仅限于非科技类ipo。最后,我们发现一些证据表明,对于非技术类ipo,保守性与公司上市后的异常股票收益呈负相关。我们得出结论,IPO招股说明书中包含的稳健性包含了有关定价、后续经营和股票回报表现的有用信息。此外,非科技类ipo招股说明书的保守性值得投资者更多关注。牛津大学出版社版权所有
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信