Preventive action against online abuse: An Australian perspective

Christine Lee
{"title":"Preventive action against online abuse: An Australian perspective","authors":"Christine Lee","doi":"10.37576/abuse.2023.049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous research into various forms of online abuse tend to calculate indicative prevalence rates. Little research has examined what courses of action are adopted to prevent further online abuse. This gap in the academic literature is addressed in this article. Data were derived from responses to an online questionnaire into online abuse. Sample comprised participants aged 25-75 who were not currently transitioning between high school and university study, alongside the 18-24 cohort who have dominated most previous research samples. Results showed that blocking abusers was the common strategy to prevent further online abuse. This is the general advice given by social media platforms when users encounter online abuse and bullying. This was followed by participants choosing not to comment on matters including feminism and racism. Fear for their personal safety fuelled the desire for participants to censor their online commentary or cease altogether. However, these were not universally adopted with some participants making no changes to their online activities following incidents of abuse. Personal responsibility for online safety only addresses micro-level online abuse. This indicates that macro-level online abuse is not being addressed adequately by social media providers, who should become more proactive in preventing online abuse.","PeriodicalId":412545,"journal":{"name":"Abuse: An International Impact Journal","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abuse: An International Impact Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37576/abuse.2023.049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research into various forms of online abuse tend to calculate indicative prevalence rates. Little research has examined what courses of action are adopted to prevent further online abuse. This gap in the academic literature is addressed in this article. Data were derived from responses to an online questionnaire into online abuse. Sample comprised participants aged 25-75 who were not currently transitioning between high school and university study, alongside the 18-24 cohort who have dominated most previous research samples. Results showed that blocking abusers was the common strategy to prevent further online abuse. This is the general advice given by social media platforms when users encounter online abuse and bullying. This was followed by participants choosing not to comment on matters including feminism and racism. Fear for their personal safety fuelled the desire for participants to censor their online commentary or cease altogether. However, these were not universally adopted with some participants making no changes to their online activities following incidents of abuse. Personal responsibility for online safety only addresses micro-level online abuse. This indicates that macro-level online abuse is not being addressed adequately by social media providers, who should become more proactive in preventing online abuse.
预防网络滥用的行动:澳大利亚的观点
以前对各种形式的网络虐待的研究倾向于计算指示性的流行率。很少有研究调查采取了哪些措施来防止进一步的网络虐待。这篇文章解决了学术文献中的这一差距。数据来自一份关于网络虐待的在线调查问卷。样本包括25-75岁的参与者,他们目前没有从高中过渡到大学学习,以及18-24岁的人群,他们在之前的研究样本中占主导地位。结果显示,阻止滥用者是防止进一步网络滥用的常见策略。这是社交媒体平台在用户遭遇网络虐待和欺凌时给出的一般建议。其次,参与者选择不对女权主义和种族主义等问题发表评论。出于对个人安全的担忧,参与者希望审查自己在网上的评论,或者干脆停止讨论。然而,这些并没有被普遍采用,一些参与者在遭受虐待事件后没有改变他们的在线活动。个人对网络安全的责任只能解决微观层面的网络滥用问题。这表明,社交媒体提供商没有充分解决宏观层面的网络滥用问题,他们应该更加积极主动地防止网络滥用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信