{"title":"Longitudinal cost of care in individuals with different subtypes of interstitial lung diseases","authors":"L. Schwarzkopf, S. Witt, J. Wälscher, M. Kreuter","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa4732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Recently, several studies emphasized the high economic burden of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). Most research focussed on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in a cross-sectional perspective and did not disentangle disease-related and non-disease-related costs. We therefore aimed by analysing claims data to a) display the share of ILD-related costs in all-cause costs in the longitudinal view, to b) disentangle the structure of ILD-related costs and corresponding shifts over time, to c) contrast subtype specific cost profiles. Methods: We assessed quarterwise health care spending for individuals with six ILD subtypes from the year prior to diagnosis up to five years post. ILD-related expenditures were identified by ATC-Codes (medication) respectively OPS-Codes and ICD-10 diagnoses (in- and outpatient care). Mean expenditures per quarter were examined via Generalized Estimation Equations adjusted by age, gender, ILD-subtype and proximity to death. Results: Costs peaked in the quarter of diagnosis (~€4,700) with a 1/3 share of ILD-related costs. Then, costs stabilized at ~€2,000 with a quite stable 20% share of ILD-related costs. Hospital care was the main contributor to ILD-related costs (>90% in quarter of diagnosis, >50% in post diagnosis period) followed by drug-expenditures (~1/3 in post diagnosis period). Longitudinal profiles were similar across ILD-subtypes with substantial differences in level. As only exception Connective Drug associated ILDs presented an increasing share of ILD-related costs over time. Conclusion: Subtype level cost profiles mirror the mainly hospital-based diagnostic process for 1st diagnosis. Declining relevance of hospital care reflects a primarily outpatient-management during follow up.","PeriodicalId":178396,"journal":{"name":"ILD/DPLD of known origin","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ILD/DPLD of known origin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa4732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Recently, several studies emphasized the high economic burden of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). Most research focussed on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in a cross-sectional perspective and did not disentangle disease-related and non-disease-related costs. We therefore aimed by analysing claims data to a) display the share of ILD-related costs in all-cause costs in the longitudinal view, to b) disentangle the structure of ILD-related costs and corresponding shifts over time, to c) contrast subtype specific cost profiles. Methods: We assessed quarterwise health care spending for individuals with six ILD subtypes from the year prior to diagnosis up to five years post. ILD-related expenditures were identified by ATC-Codes (medication) respectively OPS-Codes and ICD-10 diagnoses (in- and outpatient care). Mean expenditures per quarter were examined via Generalized Estimation Equations adjusted by age, gender, ILD-subtype and proximity to death. Results: Costs peaked in the quarter of diagnosis (~€4,700) with a 1/3 share of ILD-related costs. Then, costs stabilized at ~€2,000 with a quite stable 20% share of ILD-related costs. Hospital care was the main contributor to ILD-related costs (>90% in quarter of diagnosis, >50% in post diagnosis period) followed by drug-expenditures (~1/3 in post diagnosis period). Longitudinal profiles were similar across ILD-subtypes with substantial differences in level. As only exception Connective Drug associated ILDs presented an increasing share of ILD-related costs over time. Conclusion: Subtype level cost profiles mirror the mainly hospital-based diagnostic process for 1st diagnosis. Declining relevance of hospital care reflects a primarily outpatient-management during follow up.