METHODOLOGICAL BASIS OF THE RESEARCH OF LEGAL ALGORITHMS

D. Manko
{"title":"METHODOLOGICAL BASIS OF THE RESEARCH OF LEGAL ALGORITHMS","authors":"D. Manko","doi":"10.36059/978-966-397-177-3/190-207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Disclosure of the essence and legal nature of legal algorithms, and technologies of legal activity is connected with the necessity of establishing clear methodological tools, defining terms, concepts and categories of application of which will ensure the completeness, and comprehensiveness of their scientific comprehension. Correct methodological planning of the principals of the research is the key to a consistent study of the problem identified, the achievement of the goal and the fullest disclosure of the tasks set. P.M. Rabinovich, defines the methodology of legal science (in the narrow sense) as “a system of approaches, methods and approach of scientific research, a theoretical basis for their use in the study of state and legal phenomena” 1 . In her turn, N. Onishchenko, analyzing the methodology of the theory of state and law, noted that the latter, being a systematic set of special cognitive methods, means, methods of studying the state and law, laws of their origin and development, is based on certain, inherent principles of research state and legal reality 2 . S.S. Slivka indicates, that “under methodology should be understood to have acquired settings, formed views, a certain point of view and, in general, and a worldview that can be implemented using certain methods, approaches and means” 3 . Particular attention should be paid to the definition methodology of state theory and law, formulated by O.F. Skakun: “it is a system of general approaches, principles, methods, and means of knowing the law and the state, realized on the basis of knowledge about the laws of their application,","PeriodicalId":430051,"journal":{"name":"THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL PROBLEMS OF THE LEGAL REGULATION OF SOCIAL RELATIONS","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL PROBLEMS OF THE LEGAL REGULATION OF SOCIAL RELATIONS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36059/978-966-397-177-3/190-207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Disclosure of the essence and legal nature of legal algorithms, and technologies of legal activity is connected with the necessity of establishing clear methodological tools, defining terms, concepts and categories of application of which will ensure the completeness, and comprehensiveness of their scientific comprehension. Correct methodological planning of the principals of the research is the key to a consistent study of the problem identified, the achievement of the goal and the fullest disclosure of the tasks set. P.M. Rabinovich, defines the methodology of legal science (in the narrow sense) as “a system of approaches, methods and approach of scientific research, a theoretical basis for their use in the study of state and legal phenomena” 1 . In her turn, N. Onishchenko, analyzing the methodology of the theory of state and law, noted that the latter, being a systematic set of special cognitive methods, means, methods of studying the state and law, laws of their origin and development, is based on certain, inherent principles of research state and legal reality 2 . S.S. Slivka indicates, that “under methodology should be understood to have acquired settings, formed views, a certain point of view and, in general, and a worldview that can be implemented using certain methods, approaches and means” 3 . Particular attention should be paid to the definition methodology of state theory and law, formulated by O.F. Skakun: “it is a system of general approaches, principles, methods, and means of knowing the law and the state, realized on the basis of knowledge about the laws of their application,
法律算法研究的方法论基础
揭示法律算法和法律活动技术的本质和法律性质与建立明确的方法工具的必要性有关,定义术语、概念和应用类别,以确保对其科学理解的完整性和全面性。正确的方法规划研究的主要是关键,以一致的研究问题确定,目标的实现和最充分的披露所设定的任务。下午拉宾诺维奇(Rabinovich)将法学方法论(狭义上)定义为“科学研究的途径、方法和途径的系统,是它们用于研究国家和法律现象的理论基础”。N. Onishchenko在分析国家与法律理论的方法论时指出,后者是研究国家与法律及其起源和发展规律的一套系统的特殊认知方法、手段和方法,它基于研究国家和法律现实的某些内在原则。S.S. Slivka指出,“方法论应该被理解为具有获得的背景、形成的观点、某种观点,总的来说,以及一种可以使用某些方法、途径和手段来实现的世界观”。应当特别注意国家理论和法律的定义方法论,由O.F.斯卡昆(O.F. Skakun)提出:“它是认识法律和国家的一般途径、原则、方法和手段的体系,是在对其适用的法律的认识的基础上实现的,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信