PERBANDINGAN ANALISIS STRUKTUR PELAT LANTAI BETON KONVENSIONAL DAN PELAT LANTAI HASILPERHITUNGAN SOFTWARE SAP 2000 (MENARA USM)

N. Hari
{"title":"PERBANDINGAN ANALISIS STRUKTUR PELAT LANTAI BETON KONVENSIONAL DAN PELAT LANTAI HASILPERHITUNGAN SOFTWARE SAP 2000 (MENARA USM)","authors":"N. Hari","doi":"10.56444/jcets.v1i2.369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The floor slab is designed to behave as a diaphragm during an earthquake (Ultimate limit states). Floor slabs are designed in such a way that deflection and vibration are within serviceability limit states. The criteria for the maximum plate deflection are used according to SNI 2847-2019. \nThe analysis carried out is to compare the work of conventional concrete floor slabs and floor slabs as a result of the output analysis from the SAP 2000 software. The goal to be achieved in this study is to analyze the structure of conventional concrete slabs with the results of computer software to obtain the difference in plate reinforcement spacing so that it will be obtained optimal distance. From the conclusions of the research that has been carried out, it is obtained that conventional concrete floor slabs are narrower than the results of the spacing of the reinforcement from the software results, for the SAP output the spacing is more tenuous. Based on these results, for the selection of reinforcement spacing, it is recommended to use the smallest spacing. obtained by Manual analysis is at moment 11 of Mu = 11.109 kNm with a diameter used for Ø 10-100 mm reinforcement, while analysis with SAP 2000 software is obtained at moment 11 for M11 = 9.876 kN.m with a diameter used for plain reinforcement Ø10-150 .Based on the plate moment obtained by Manual analysis is at moment 22 of Mu = 7.454 kNm with a diameter used for reinforcement Ø 10-150 mm, while analysis with SAP 2000 software is obtained at moment 22 of Mu = 6.507 kN.m with a diameter used plain reinforcement Ø10-200.","PeriodicalId":321137,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology Sciences","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56444/jcets.v1i2.369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The floor slab is designed to behave as a diaphragm during an earthquake (Ultimate limit states). Floor slabs are designed in such a way that deflection and vibration are within serviceability limit states. The criteria for the maximum plate deflection are used according to SNI 2847-2019. The analysis carried out is to compare the work of conventional concrete floor slabs and floor slabs as a result of the output analysis from the SAP 2000 software. The goal to be achieved in this study is to analyze the structure of conventional concrete slabs with the results of computer software to obtain the difference in plate reinforcement spacing so that it will be obtained optimal distance. From the conclusions of the research that has been carried out, it is obtained that conventional concrete floor slabs are narrower than the results of the spacing of the reinforcement from the software results, for the SAP output the spacing is more tenuous. Based on these results, for the selection of reinforcement spacing, it is recommended to use the smallest spacing. obtained by Manual analysis is at moment 11 of Mu = 11.109 kNm with a diameter used for Ø 10-100 mm reinforcement, while analysis with SAP 2000 software is obtained at moment 11 for M11 = 9.876 kN.m with a diameter used for plain reinforcement Ø10-150 .Based on the plate moment obtained by Manual analysis is at moment 22 of Mu = 7.454 kNm with a diameter used for reinforcement Ø 10-150 mm, while analysis with SAP 2000 software is obtained at moment 22 of Mu = 6.507 kN.m with a diameter used plain reinforcement Ø10-200.
传统混凝土板结构与SAP 2000软件(USM tower)计算板的比较
楼板被设计成在地震中充当隔膜(极限状态)。楼板的设计方式使挠度和振动在使用极限状态内。最大板挠度的标准根据SNI 2847-2019使用。所进行的分析是比较传统混凝土楼板和楼板的工作,这是SAP 2000软件输出分析的结果。本研究的目标是利用计算机软件的结果对常规混凝土板的结构进行分析,得到板间配筋间距的差异,从而得到最优间距。从已经开展的研究结论来看,常规混凝土楼板的配筋间距比软件计算结果窄,SAP输出的配筋间距更细。根据以上结果,在选择配筋间距时,建议采用最小间距。手工分析得到的第11时刻为Mu = 11.109 kNm,直径为Ø 10-100 mm的钢筋;SAP 2000软件分析得到的第11时刻为M11 = 9.876 kN。m,直径为素筋Ø10-150 .基于手工分析得到的板矩为22 μ m = 7.454 kN,直径为Ø10-150 mm,而SAP 2000软件分析得到22 μ m = 6.507 kN。M带直径采用平筋Ø10-200。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信