Double Vision: Encountering Early Ethnographic Films in the Digital Archive

Petra Löffler
{"title":"Double Vision: Encountering Early Ethnographic Films in the Digital Archive","authors":"Petra Löffler","doi":"10.15664/fcj.v19i0.2390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1908, Georg Thilenius, director of the Hamburg Museum für Völkerkunde, sent a group of researchers on an expedition to the then-German colonies in Melanesia and Micronesia. The team was also equipped with a film camera. In comparison to the several thousand photographs, sketches, and notes the quantity of film produced was very low: only around eleven minutes could be shot on 35mm footage. This footage, transferred to 16mm film in the 1940s and digitised in 2018-19, is analysed both as an event of early ethnographic filmmaking and as a specific archival object: to date the object biography of the Hamburg films shows significant changes of their materiality and no less important ruptures concerning their preserving archives. This featurette raises questions about the significance of film recordings for ethnographic research, the role of archives and museums in their preservation or digitisation, and, not least, their entanglement in German colonial politics. It reconstructs the object biography of the Hamburg films based on signatures, inventory lists, and descriptions of the expedition members to shed light on this entanglement and to question its status as an archival object. In doing so it argues for a relational understanding of ethnographic filmmaking and its preservation that accounts for the responsibilities, constraints, and different interests of the people and institutions involved in capturing, distributing, and transforming moving images into an archival object.  ","PeriodicalId":423883,"journal":{"name":"Frames Cinema Journal","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frames Cinema Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15664/fcj.v19i0.2390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1908, Georg Thilenius, director of the Hamburg Museum für Völkerkunde, sent a group of researchers on an expedition to the then-German colonies in Melanesia and Micronesia. The team was also equipped with a film camera. In comparison to the several thousand photographs, sketches, and notes the quantity of film produced was very low: only around eleven minutes could be shot on 35mm footage. This footage, transferred to 16mm film in the 1940s and digitised in 2018-19, is analysed both as an event of early ethnographic filmmaking and as a specific archival object: to date the object biography of the Hamburg films shows significant changes of their materiality and no less important ruptures concerning their preserving archives. This featurette raises questions about the significance of film recordings for ethnographic research, the role of archives and museums in their preservation or digitisation, and, not least, their entanglement in German colonial politics. It reconstructs the object biography of the Hamburg films based on signatures, inventory lists, and descriptions of the expedition members to shed light on this entanglement and to question its status as an archival object. In doing so it argues for a relational understanding of ethnographic filmmaking and its preservation that accounts for the responsibilities, constraints, and different interests of the people and institutions involved in capturing, distributing, and transforming moving images into an archival object.  
双重视野:在数字档案中遇到早期民族志电影
1908年,汉堡博物馆 r Völkerkunde馆长乔治·蒂勒纽斯(Georg Thilenius)派遣一组研究人员前往当时德国在美拉尼西亚和密克罗尼西亚的殖民地进行考察。科考队还配备了一台胶片摄像机。与几千张照片、草图和笔记相比,制作的胶片数量非常少:35毫米胶片只能拍摄大约11分钟。这段镜头在20世纪40年代被转移到16毫米胶片上,并于2018-19年进行了数字化,作为早期民族志电影制作的事件和特定的档案对象进行了分析:迄今为止,汉堡电影的对象传记显示了它们的物质上的重大变化,以及它们保存档案方面同样重要的断裂。这篇专题文章提出了一些问题,包括电影记录对民族志研究的意义、档案馆和博物馆在保存或数字化方面的作用,以及它们与德国殖民政治的纠缠。它根据签名、库存清单和探险队成员的描述重建了汉堡电影的对象传记,以阐明这种纠缠,并质疑其作为档案对象的地位。在此过程中,它论证了对民族志电影制作及其保存的一种关系理解,这种理解说明了参与捕捉、分发和将运动图像转换为档案对象的人和机构的责任、约束和不同利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信