Characterizing Elite Scholars of Library and Information Science: A Bibliometric Analysis

Akhtar Abbas, Nadeem Siddique, Ayesha Gulzar, Usama Amin Khan, Muhammad Ajmal Khan, Khalid Mahmood
{"title":"Characterizing Elite Scholars of Library and Information Science: A Bibliometric Analysis","authors":"Akhtar Abbas, Nadeem Siddique, Ayesha Gulzar, Usama Amin Khan, Muhammad Ajmal Khan, Khalid Mahmood","doi":"10.52461/jimp.v2i2.1429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Publication metrics have become crucial to measure the productivity and impact of individuals and organizations for highlighting their influence upon the knowledge world. This study aims to present a bibliometric analysis of the top two percent highly cited Library and Information Science (LIS) researchers in the Stanford University list of the top two percent researchers of various disciplines published in 2021. We have used the bibliometric method to analyze 254 highly cited LIS researchers. The findings show male dominance and female underrepresentation in LIS research. Leydesdorff, Loet is the most highly cited researcher of the LIS field. The Amsterdam School of Communications Research, Netherlands, is the most highly cited organization of LIS based on the highly cited researchers affiliated with it. The majority of LIS researchers belong to USA and UK. There is a meager contribution of Asian, Australian, and African countries producing highly cited LIS researchers. Highly cited LIS researchers are more familiar with publishing research in information retrieval, information seeking, and bibliometrics. Positions of researchers at different ranks by different measures depict their productivity, impact, h- index, and a composite score. A strong correlation exists between total publications and total citations. The study, in its nature, is unique and will provide an insight for young and emerging researchers for selection of research direction, persons for research collaboration, and a motivation to invest more efforts for impactful research.","PeriodicalId":444062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Management and Practices","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Management and Practices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52461/jimp.v2i2.1429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Publication metrics have become crucial to measure the productivity and impact of individuals and organizations for highlighting their influence upon the knowledge world. This study aims to present a bibliometric analysis of the top two percent highly cited Library and Information Science (LIS) researchers in the Stanford University list of the top two percent researchers of various disciplines published in 2021. We have used the bibliometric method to analyze 254 highly cited LIS researchers. The findings show male dominance and female underrepresentation in LIS research. Leydesdorff, Loet is the most highly cited researcher of the LIS field. The Amsterdam School of Communications Research, Netherlands, is the most highly cited organization of LIS based on the highly cited researchers affiliated with it. The majority of LIS researchers belong to USA and UK. There is a meager contribution of Asian, Australian, and African countries producing highly cited LIS researchers. Highly cited LIS researchers are more familiar with publishing research in information retrieval, information seeking, and bibliometrics. Positions of researchers at different ranks by different measures depict their productivity, impact, h- index, and a composite score. A strong correlation exists between total publications and total citations. The study, in its nature, is unique and will provide an insight for young and emerging researchers for selection of research direction, persons for research collaboration, and a motivation to invest more efforts for impactful research.
图书馆情报学精英学者的特征:文献计量学分析
出版指标已经成为衡量个人和组织的生产力和影响的关键,以突出他们对知识世界的影响。本研究旨在对斯坦福大学2021年公布的各学科排名前2%的高被引图书馆与信息科学(LIS)研究人员进行文献计量分析。本文采用文献计量学方法对254位高被引学者进行了分析。研究结果显示,在LIS研究中,男性占主导地位,女性代表性不足。ledesdorff, Loet是LIS领域被引用次数最多的研究者。荷兰的阿姆斯特丹通信研究学院是被引用率最高的LIS组织,这是基于其下属的高被引用率的研究人员。大多数美国研究人员来自美国和英国。亚洲、澳大利亚和非洲国家产出的高被引美国研究人员贡献甚微。高被引的LIS研究人员更熟悉信息检索、信息搜索和文献计量学方面的出版研究。不同级别的研究人员的职位通过不同的措施来描述他们的生产力、影响力、h-指数和综合得分。总出版物和总引用之间存在很强的相关性。这项研究在本质上是独一无二的,它将为年轻和新兴的研究人员选择研究方向、研究合作人员提供见解,并激励他们为有影响力的研究投入更多努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信