Simple Multiple Noisy Label Utilization Strategies

V. Sheng
{"title":"Simple Multiple Noisy Label Utilization Strategies","authors":"V. Sheng","doi":"10.1109/ICDM.2011.133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the outsourcing of small tasks becoming easier, it is possible to obtain non-expert/imperfect labels at low cost. With low-cost imperfect labeling, it is straightforward to collect multiple labels for the same data items. This paper addresses the strategies of utilizing these multiple labels for improving the performance of supervised learning, based on two basic ideas: majority voting and pair wise solutions. We show several interesting results based on our experiments. The soft majority voting strategies can reduce the bias and roughness, and improve the performance of the directed hard majority voting strategy. Pair wise strategies can completely avoid the bias by having both sides (potential correct and incorrect/noisy information) considered (for binary classification). They have very good performance whenever there are a few or many labels available. However, it could also keep the noise. The improved variation that reduces the impact of the noisy information is recommended. All five strategies investigated are labeling quality agnostic strategies, and can be applied to real world applications directly. The experimental results show some of them perform better than or at least very close to the gnostic strategies.","PeriodicalId":106216,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2011.133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

With the outsourcing of small tasks becoming easier, it is possible to obtain non-expert/imperfect labels at low cost. With low-cost imperfect labeling, it is straightforward to collect multiple labels for the same data items. This paper addresses the strategies of utilizing these multiple labels for improving the performance of supervised learning, based on two basic ideas: majority voting and pair wise solutions. We show several interesting results based on our experiments. The soft majority voting strategies can reduce the bias and roughness, and improve the performance of the directed hard majority voting strategy. Pair wise strategies can completely avoid the bias by having both sides (potential correct and incorrect/noisy information) considered (for binary classification). They have very good performance whenever there are a few or many labels available. However, it could also keep the noise. The improved variation that reduces the impact of the noisy information is recommended. All five strategies investigated are labeling quality agnostic strategies, and can be applied to real world applications directly. The experimental results show some of them perform better than or at least very close to the gnostic strategies.
简单的多噪声标签利用策略
随着小任务的外包变得更加容易,以低成本获得非专家/不完美标签成为可能。使用低成本的不完全标签,可以直接为相同的数据项收集多个标签。本文基于两个基本思想:多数投票和配对解决方案,讨论了利用这些多标签来提高监督学习性能的策略。根据我们的实验,我们展示了几个有趣的结果。软多数投票策略可以减少偏向性和粗糙度,提高直接硬多数投票策略的性能。配对策略可以通过考虑双方(潜在的正确和不正确/噪声信息)来完全避免偏差(对于二元分类)。每当有几个或许多标签可用时,它们都具有非常好的性能。然而,它也可以保持噪音。建议采用减少噪声信息影响的改进变量。所研究的所有五种策略都是标签质量不可知策略,可以直接应用于现实世界的应用。实验结果表明,其中一些策略的表现优于或至少非常接近诺斯替策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信