Voluntary Standards as Enablers and Impediments to Sustainable Consumption

A. Rasche
{"title":"Voluntary Standards as Enablers and Impediments to Sustainable Consumption","authors":"A. Rasche","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2402701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter discusses the role of voluntary standards for corporate sustainability and responsibility as enablers of and impediments to sustainable consumption. We start by theoretically reflecting on the notion of standards, discussing different characteristics of this mode of regulation. Next we distinguish different types of standards for corporate sustainability and responsibility. Our subsequent analysis shows that standards enable sustainable consumption by (1) reducing information asymmetries, informing consumers about the social and environmental conditions under which products and services are created, (2) supporting the disclosure of firms’ sustainability-related information (potentially leading to increased consumer loyalty), and (3) further institutionalizing the discourse around sustainable consumption. However, our discussion also emphasizes that voluntary standards can impede sustainable consumption, because (1) the coexistence of a variety of competing initiatives in some sectors (e.g. fair trade coffee) is likely to confuse consumers, (2) consumers may question the credibility of selected standards, since highly public scandals have revealed the limits of auditing and monitoring practices, and (3) while many standards are designed as multi-stakeholder initiatives, only few of them directly involve consumer representatives, leaving the impression that some standards define practices for consumers but not with them.","PeriodicalId":240153,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Corporate Reporting (Topic)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Corporate Reporting (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2402701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This chapter discusses the role of voluntary standards for corporate sustainability and responsibility as enablers of and impediments to sustainable consumption. We start by theoretically reflecting on the notion of standards, discussing different characteristics of this mode of regulation. Next we distinguish different types of standards for corporate sustainability and responsibility. Our subsequent analysis shows that standards enable sustainable consumption by (1) reducing information asymmetries, informing consumers about the social and environmental conditions under which products and services are created, (2) supporting the disclosure of firms’ sustainability-related information (potentially leading to increased consumer loyalty), and (3) further institutionalizing the discourse around sustainable consumption. However, our discussion also emphasizes that voluntary standards can impede sustainable consumption, because (1) the coexistence of a variety of competing initiatives in some sectors (e.g. fair trade coffee) is likely to confuse consumers, (2) consumers may question the credibility of selected standards, since highly public scandals have revealed the limits of auditing and monitoring practices, and (3) while many standards are designed as multi-stakeholder initiatives, only few of them directly involve consumer representatives, leaving the impression that some standards define practices for consumers but not with them.
自愿性标准作为可持续消费的推动者和障碍
本章讨论了企业可持续发展和责任的自愿标准的作用,作为可持续消费的推动者和障碍。我们首先从理论上反思标准的概念,讨论这种监管模式的不同特征。接下来,我们将区分不同类型的企业可持续发展和责任标准。我们随后的分析表明,标准通过以下方式实现可持续消费:(1)减少信息不对称,告知消费者创造产品和服务的社会和环境条件;(2)支持企业披露与可持续相关的信息(可能导致消费者忠诚度的增加);(3)进一步将围绕可持续消费的话语制度化。然而,我们的讨论还强调,自愿性标准可能会阻碍可持续消费,因为(1)在某些行业(例如公平贸易咖啡)中,各种竞争举措的共存可能会让消费者感到困惑,(2)消费者可能会质疑选定标准的可信度,因为高度公开的丑闻揭示了审计和监测实践的局限性,(3)虽然许多标准被设计为多方利益相关者的举措,其中只有少数直接涉及到消费者代表,给人留下的印象是,一些标准为消费者定义了实践,而不是消费者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信