Self-organization of Network Communities via Blockchain Technology: Reputation Systems and Limits of Digital Democracy

D. Mukhametov
{"title":"Self-organization of Network Communities via Blockchain Technology: Reputation Systems and Limits of Digital Democracy","authors":"D. Mukhametov","doi":"10.1109/SYNCHROINFO49631.2020.9166109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the analysis of the use of blockchain technology for self-organization of network communities. Network communities are characterized by the key role of trust in personal interactions, the need for repeated interactions, strong and weak ties within the network, social learning as the mechanism of self-organization. Therefore, in network communities reputation is the central component of social action, assessment of the situation, and formation of the expectations. The current proliferation of virtual network communities requires the development of appropriate technical infrastructure in the form of reputation systems - programs that provide calculation of network members reputation and organization of their cooperation and interaction. Traditional reputation systems have vulnerabilities in the field of information security and prevention of abusive behavior of agents. Overcoming these restrictions is possible through integration of reputation systems and blockchain technology that allows to increase transparency of reputation assessment system and prevent attempts of manipulation the system and social engineering. At the same time, the most promising is the use of blockchain-oracles to ensure communication between the algorithms of blockchain-based reputation system and the external information environment. The popularization of blockchain technology and its implementation in various spheres of social management, production control, economic exchange actualizes the problems of using digital technologies in political processes and their impact on the formation of digital authoritarianism, digital democracy and digital anarchism. The paper emphasizes that blockchain technology and reputation systems can equally benefit both the resources of government control and tools of democratization and public accountability to civil society or even practices of avoiding government. Therefore, it is important to take into account the problems of political institutionalization, path dependence and the creation of differentiated incentives as well as the technological aspects.","PeriodicalId":255578,"journal":{"name":"2020 Systems of Signal Synchronization, Generating and Processing in Telecommunications (SYNCHROINFO)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Systems of Signal Synchronization, Generating and Processing in Telecommunications (SYNCHROINFO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SYNCHROINFO49631.2020.9166109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the use of blockchain technology for self-organization of network communities. Network communities are characterized by the key role of trust in personal interactions, the need for repeated interactions, strong and weak ties within the network, social learning as the mechanism of self-organization. Therefore, in network communities reputation is the central component of social action, assessment of the situation, and formation of the expectations. The current proliferation of virtual network communities requires the development of appropriate technical infrastructure in the form of reputation systems - programs that provide calculation of network members reputation and organization of their cooperation and interaction. Traditional reputation systems have vulnerabilities in the field of information security and prevention of abusive behavior of agents. Overcoming these restrictions is possible through integration of reputation systems and blockchain technology that allows to increase transparency of reputation assessment system and prevent attempts of manipulation the system and social engineering. At the same time, the most promising is the use of blockchain-oracles to ensure communication between the algorithms of blockchain-based reputation system and the external information environment. The popularization of blockchain technology and its implementation in various spheres of social management, production control, economic exchange actualizes the problems of using digital technologies in political processes and their impact on the formation of digital authoritarianism, digital democracy and digital anarchism. The paper emphasizes that blockchain technology and reputation systems can equally benefit both the resources of government control and tools of democratization and public accountability to civil society or even practices of avoiding government. Therefore, it is important to take into account the problems of political institutionalization, path dependence and the creation of differentiated incentives as well as the technological aspects.
基于区块链技术的网络社区自组织:声誉系统与数字民主的局限性
本文致力于分析区块链技术在网络社区自组织中的应用。网络社区的特征是信任在个人互动中的关键作用、重复互动的需要、网络内的强弱联系、作为自组织机制的社会学习。因此,在网络社区中,声誉是社会行动、评估形势和形成期望的核心组成部分。当前虚拟网络社区的激增需要以信誉系统的形式开发适当的技术基础设施-提供计算网络成员声誉和组织他们的合作和互动的程序。传统的信誉系统在信息安全和防止代理滥用行为方面存在漏洞。通过声誉系统和区块链技术的整合,可以克服这些限制,从而提高声誉评估系统的透明度,防止操纵系统和社会工程的企图。同时,最有希望的是使用区块链预言机来确保基于区块链的信誉系统的算法与外部信息环境之间的通信。区块链技术的普及及其在社会管理、生产控制、经济交换等各个领域的实施,使数字技术在政治进程中使用的问题及其对数字威权主义、数字民主和数字无政府主义形成的影响成为现实。本文强调,区块链技术和声誉系统可以平等地受益于政府控制的资源和民主化的工具,以及公民社会的公共问责制,甚至是避免政府的做法。因此,重要的是要考虑到政治制度化、路径依赖和创造有区别的奖励以及技术方面的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信