I International Criminal Justice Institutions: From the First Ad Hoc Tribunals and Their Precedents to the ICC and Beyond

Ambos Kai
{"title":"I International Criminal Justice Institutions: From the First Ad Hoc Tribunals and Their Precedents to the ICC and Beyond","authors":"Ambos Kai","doi":"10.1093/law/9780192844262.003.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter is both an institutional and historical analysis of International Criminal Justice. Even though the International Military Tribunals in Nuremberg and Tokyo are widely perceived as the birth of International Criminal Justice, the chapter starts with historical precedents of these tribunals: for instance, the Versailles Peace Treaty (VPT) as the first international instrument providing for the prosecution of war criminals. The international Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals are then examined in detail and from several perspectives – except the procedural perspective that is dealt with by Volume III. These tribunals laid the groundwork for subsequent Tribunals and mechanisms. Thus, the chapter proceeds with the establishment of the UN Ad Hoc Tribunals, the International Criminal Court and the more recent mixed or hybrid Tribunals. The focus of the analysis lies on the development of those tribunals, their institutional setting, and main aspects of both their legal regime and developed case law. The practice of the ICC is especially evaluated against the background of criticism regarding its alleged African focus or even bias. The last section on hybrid tribunals also takes a broader look at other investigative and accountability mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":165706,"journal":{"name":"Treatise on International Criminal Law","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Treatise on International Criminal Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780192844262.003.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter is both an institutional and historical analysis of International Criminal Justice. Even though the International Military Tribunals in Nuremberg and Tokyo are widely perceived as the birth of International Criminal Justice, the chapter starts with historical precedents of these tribunals: for instance, the Versailles Peace Treaty (VPT) as the first international instrument providing for the prosecution of war criminals. The international Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals are then examined in detail and from several perspectives – except the procedural perspective that is dealt with by Volume III. These tribunals laid the groundwork for subsequent Tribunals and mechanisms. Thus, the chapter proceeds with the establishment of the UN Ad Hoc Tribunals, the International Criminal Court and the more recent mixed or hybrid Tribunals. The focus of the analysis lies on the development of those tribunals, their institutional setting, and main aspects of both their legal regime and developed case law. The practice of the ICC is especially evaluated against the background of criticism regarding its alleged African focus or even bias. The last section on hybrid tribunals also takes a broader look at other investigative and accountability mechanisms.
国际刑事司法机构:从第一个特设法庭及其先例到国际刑事法院及其以后
本章是对国际刑事司法的制度和历史分析。尽管纽伦堡国际军事法庭和东京国际军事法庭被广泛认为是国际刑事司法的诞生,但本章从这些法庭的历史先例开始:例如,《凡尔赛和平条约》(VPT)是第一个规定起诉战犯的国际文书。然后从几个角度详细审查纽伦堡国际法庭和东京国际法庭- -第三卷讨论的程序角度除外。这些法庭为后来的法庭和机制奠定了基础。因此,本章接着介绍联合国特设法庭、国际刑事法院和最近的混合或混合法庭的设立。分析的重点在于这些法庭的发展,它们的机构设置,以及它们的法律制度和发达的判例法的主要方面。国际刑事法院的做法尤其受到对其所谓的非洲重点甚至偏见的批评。关于混合法庭的最后一节还对其他调查和问责机制进行了更广泛的探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信