SARS-CoV-2 Is a Robot Bioweapon

Li-meng Yan, A. Cheok
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2 Is a Robot Bioweapon","authors":"Li-meng Yan, A. Cheok","doi":"10.4018/978-1-7998-4679-6.ch006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two possibilities should be considered for the origin of SARS-CoV-2: natural evolution or laboratory creation. In the authors' earlier report titled “Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route,” they disproved the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 arising naturally through evolution and instead proved that SARS-CoV-2 must have been a product of laboratory modification. Despite this and similar efforts, the laboratory creation theory continues to be downplayed or even diminished. This is fundamentally because the natural origin theory remains supported by several novel coronaviruses published after the start of the outbreak. Here, however, the authors use in-depth analyses of the available data and literature to prove that these novel animal coronaviruses do not exist in nature.","PeriodicalId":251020,"journal":{"name":"Analyzing Current and Future Global Trends in Populism","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analyzing Current and Future Global Trends in Populism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4679-6.ch006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two possibilities should be considered for the origin of SARS-CoV-2: natural evolution or laboratory creation. In the authors' earlier report titled “Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route,” they disproved the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 arising naturally through evolution and instead proved that SARS-CoV-2 must have been a product of laboratory modification. Despite this and similar efforts, the laboratory creation theory continues to be downplayed or even diminished. This is fundamentally because the natural origin theory remains supported by several novel coronaviruses published after the start of the outbreak. Here, however, the authors use in-depth analyses of the available data and literature to prove that these novel animal coronaviruses do not exist in nature.
SARS-CoV-2是机器人生物武器
SARS-CoV-2的起源应该考虑两种可能性:自然进化或实验室创造。此前,他们在题为《SARS-CoV-2基因组的不同寻常特征表明,SARS-CoV-2可能是经过复杂的实验室修饰而不是自然进化的,并描绘了其可能的合成路线》的报告中,反驳了SARS-CoV-2通过进化自然产生的可能性,而是证明了SARS-CoV-2一定是实验室修饰的产物。尽管有这样和类似的努力,实验室创造理论继续被低估,甚至被削弱。这从根本上是因为自然起源理论仍然得到疫情开始后发表的几种新型冠状病毒的支持。然而,在这里,作者对现有数据和文献进行了深入分析,证明这些新型动物冠状病毒在自然界中不存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信