THE EXHAUSTION OF COOLING-OFF PERIOD: A NON-MANDATORY PRE-CONDITION IN INVESTMENT ARBITRATION

Addyana Belaputri, Gregory Joshua, Jesslyn Febria, Muhammad Irsyad Marwandy
{"title":"THE EXHAUSTION OF COOLING-OFF PERIOD: A NON-MANDATORY PRE-CONDITION IN INVESTMENT ARBITRATION","authors":"Addyana Belaputri, Gregory Joshua, Jesslyn Febria, Muhammad Irsyad Marwandy","doi":"10.23920/transbuslj.v2i2.788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Arbitration as an alternative institution to settle commercial disputes has been widely recognized by the business community and state governments. Dispute settlement through arbitration usually derives from the treaty or contract breach which is put under dispute settlement clause. In regard to investor-state dispute settlement, international arbitration plays an important role. However, there are several admissibility requirements that relate to the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, in particular, cooling-off period requirement. This article is placed for the nature and provision of cooling-off period requirement by analyzing several precedent jurisprudences through juridical normative methods. The cooling-off period in Investment Arbitration has been considered as jurisdictional requirement which also integrated with the procedural requirement to submit investment dispute to ISDS arbitration.","PeriodicalId":175924,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Business Law Journal","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Business Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23920/transbuslj.v2i2.788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Arbitration as an alternative institution to settle commercial disputes has been widely recognized by the business community and state governments. Dispute settlement through arbitration usually derives from the treaty or contract breach which is put under dispute settlement clause. In regard to investor-state dispute settlement, international arbitration plays an important role. However, there are several admissibility requirements that relate to the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, in particular, cooling-off period requirement. This article is placed for the nature and provision of cooling-off period requirement by analyzing several precedent jurisprudences through juridical normative methods. The cooling-off period in Investment Arbitration has been considered as jurisdictional requirement which also integrated with the procedural requirement to submit investment dispute to ISDS arbitration.
冷静期耗尽:投资仲裁的非强制性先决条件
仲裁作为解决商事纠纷的另一种方式,已得到企业界和州政府的广泛认可。通过仲裁解决争议通常源于争议解决条款所规定的条约或合同违约。在投资者与国家之间的争端解决中,国际仲裁发挥着重要作用。但是,有几项与法庭管辖权有关的受理要求,特别是冷静期要求。本文运用司法规范的方法,通过对若干判例的分析,对冷静期要求的性质和规定进行了探讨。投资仲裁中的冷静期被认为是一种管辖权要求,它也与将投资争端提交ISDS仲裁的程序要求相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信