Understanding the Role of Wonderment Questions Related to Activation of Conceptual Resources in Scientific Model Construction: Focusing on Students` Epistemological Framing and Positional Framing

Chae-eun Lee, Heui-baik Kim
{"title":"Understanding the Role of Wonderment Questions Related to Activation of Conceptual Resources in Scientific Model Construction: Focusing on Students` Epistemological Framing and Positional Framing","authors":"Chae-eun Lee, Heui-baik Kim","doi":"10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.3.0471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to explore how students’ epistemological framing and positional framing affect the role of wonderment questions related to the activation of conceptual resources and to investigate what contexts affect students’ framings during scientific model construction. Four students were selected as focus group and they participated in collaborative scientific model construction of mechanisms relating to urination. According to the results, one student whose framings were \"understanding phenomena\" and \"facilitator\" asked wonderment questions, but the others whose framings were \"classroom game\" and \"non-respondent\" were not able to activate their conceptual resources. However, they were able to activate their conceptual resources when they shared the epistemological framing of \"understanding phenomena\" and shifted between the positional framings of \"facilitator\" and \"respondent.\" Although they were able to activate their conceptual resources, these activated resources were not able to contribute to their model when they shifted to the framings of \"classroom game\" and \"receiver.\" In contrast, when students constantly shared an \"understanding phenomena\" framing and dynamically shifted between the framings of \"facilitator\" and \"respondent,\" they were able to activate various conceptual resources and develop their group model. The students’ framings were affected by the contexts. These included: when students were confronted with cognitive difficulties and were not provided proper scaffolding; when the teacher played the role of answer provider and guided the activity with correctness; when there were several possible explanatory models that students could choose from; and when the teacher played the role of thought facilitator. This study contributes to supporting teaching and learning environments for productive scientific model construction.","PeriodicalId":107400,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.3.0471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore how students’ epistemological framing and positional framing affect the role of wonderment questions related to the activation of conceptual resources and to investigate what contexts affect students’ framings during scientific model construction. Four students were selected as focus group and they participated in collaborative scientific model construction of mechanisms relating to urination. According to the results, one student whose framings were "understanding phenomena" and "facilitator" asked wonderment questions, but the others whose framings were "classroom game" and "non-respondent" were not able to activate their conceptual resources. However, they were able to activate their conceptual resources when they shared the epistemological framing of "understanding phenomena" and shifted between the positional framings of "facilitator" and "respondent." Although they were able to activate their conceptual resources, these activated resources were not able to contribute to their model when they shifted to the framings of "classroom game" and "receiver." In contrast, when students constantly shared an "understanding phenomena" framing and dynamically shifted between the framings of "facilitator" and "respondent," they were able to activate various conceptual resources and develop their group model. The students’ framings were affected by the contexts. These included: when students were confronted with cognitive difficulties and were not provided proper scaffolding; when the teacher played the role of answer provider and guided the activity with correctness; when there were several possible explanatory models that students could choose from; and when the teacher played the role of thought facilitator. This study contributes to supporting teaching and learning environments for productive scientific model construction.
理解与概念资源激活相关的好奇问题在科学模型建构中的作用:以学生的认识论框架和位置框架为中心
本研究旨在探讨学生的认识论框架和位置框架如何影响与概念资源激活相关的惊奇问题的作用,并探讨在科学模型建构过程中,什么样的情境会影响学生的框架。选取4名学生作为焦点组,参与排尿相关机制的协同科学模型构建。结果显示,“理解现象”和“促进者”框架组中有1名学生提出了令人惊奇的问题,而“课堂游戏”和“非应答者”框架组中有2名学生未能激活他们的概念资源。然而,当他们共享“理解现象”的认识论框架,并在“促进者”和“被调查者”的位置框架之间转换时,他们能够激活他们的概念资源。虽然他们能够激活他们的概念资源,但当他们转移到“课堂游戏”和“接收者”的框架时,这些激活的资源无法为他们的模型做出贡献。相反,当学生不断共享“理解现象”框架并在“促进者”和“被调查者”框架之间动态转换时,他们能够激活各种概念资源并发展他们的群体模型。学生的框架受到语境的影响。这些包括:当学生面临认知困难,没有提供适当的脚手架;当教师扮演答案提供者的角色,以正确的方式指导活动时;当有几个可能的解释模型可供学生选择时;当老师扮演思想促进者的角色时。本研究有助于为生产性科学模式建设提供教学环境支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信