How to Obtain Valid Generalized Modal Syllogisms from Valid Generalized Syllogisms

Jing Xu, Xiaojun Zhang
{"title":"How to Obtain Valid Generalized Modal Syllogisms from Valid Generalized Syllogisms","authors":"Jing Xu, Xiaojun Zhang","doi":"10.22158/asir.v7n2p45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Making full use of the truth value definitions of sentences with quantification, possible world semantics and/or fuzzy logic, one can prove the validity of generalized modal syllogisms. This paper shows that the proof of the validity of a generalized modal syllogism can be transformed into that of its corresponding generalized syllogism, and that the generalized syllogism obtained by removing all modalities in any valid generalized modal syllogism is still valid. Therefore, the simplest way to screen out valid generalized modal syllogisms is to add modalities to valid generalized syllogisms, and then to delete all invalid syllogisms by means of the basic rules with which valid generalized modal syllogisms should meet. And then the remainders are valid. This paper illustrates how to obtain 12 valid generalized modal syllogisms by adding necessary modalities and/or possible modalities to any valid generalized syllogism. The two kinds of syllogisms discussed in this paper are composed of sentences with quantification which is the largest number of sentences in natural language. Hence, this innovative research can provide theoretical support for linguistics, logic, artificial intelligence, and among other fields.","PeriodicalId":356167,"journal":{"name":"Applied Science and Innovative Research","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Science and Innovative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/asir.v7n2p45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Making full use of the truth value definitions of sentences with quantification, possible world semantics and/or fuzzy logic, one can prove the validity of generalized modal syllogisms. This paper shows that the proof of the validity of a generalized modal syllogism can be transformed into that of its corresponding generalized syllogism, and that the generalized syllogism obtained by removing all modalities in any valid generalized modal syllogism is still valid. Therefore, the simplest way to screen out valid generalized modal syllogisms is to add modalities to valid generalized syllogisms, and then to delete all invalid syllogisms by means of the basic rules with which valid generalized modal syllogisms should meet. And then the remainders are valid. This paper illustrates how to obtain 12 valid generalized modal syllogisms by adding necessary modalities and/or possible modalities to any valid generalized syllogism. The two kinds of syllogisms discussed in this paper are composed of sentences with quantification which is the largest number of sentences in natural language. Hence, this innovative research can provide theoretical support for linguistics, logic, artificial intelligence, and among other fields.
如何从有效的广义三段论中得到有效的广义模态三段论
充分利用量子化、可能世界语义和/或模糊逻辑的句子的真值定义,可以证明广义模态三段论的有效性。本文证明了一个广义模态三段论的有效性证明可以转化为其相应的广义三段论的有效性证明,并且证明了任何有效的广义模态三段论中去掉所有模态得到的广义三段论仍然是有效的。因此,筛选有效的广义模态三段论最简单的方法是为有效的广义三段论添加模态,然后根据有效的广义模态三段论应满足的基本规则删除所有无效的三段论。余数是有效的。本文举例说明了如何在任何有效的广义三段论中加入必要模态和/或可能模态,从而得到12个有效的广义模态三段论。本文讨论的两种三段论都是由量词组成的句子,量词是自然语言中句子数量最多的。因此,这一创新研究可以为语言学、逻辑学、人工智能等领域提供理论支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信