{"title":"Quality of life patients with anorectal disorders","authors":"Ahmadova Esmira Vaqif","doi":"10.36811/OSJS.2019.110006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, assessment of treatments effectiveness carried out by different methods. About 20 years before due to clinical signs we can make a decision about the severity degree of disease, patients health status. However, now it is not enough. The most important lack of this approach is that in this situation patient’s opinion is neglected. Development of medicine, changing of relationship between patients and doctors give birth to a new direction: unilateral approach replaced by mutual cooperation both of sides. Until the last decades of XX century all treatment results, both conservative and surgical, were evaluated due to the clinical, laboratory and instrumental investigations. As officials defined by the World Health Organization, health is a state of complete physical, mental and social wellbeing [6]. So, during the patient’s conditions assessment all these parameters should investigate. Firstly, Errington in 1966 gave an idea about using quality of life for the describing disease effects. Officials this terming in medicine was established in 1977 [3]. Since that time “Quality of life” used widely in the medicine. Today this is one of the common, convenient and informative methods, which allow physicians assess the patient’s status by following the main rule of medicine- to treat the patient, not the disease [2,4,5]. Its advantages are:\n\nComprehensiveness - it covers all aspects of health Dynamism- allow to monitoring patients status Patients participation- this is the main benefit.","PeriodicalId":301029,"journal":{"name":"Open Scientific Journal of Surgery","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Scientific Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36811/OSJS.2019.110006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Nowadays, assessment of treatments effectiveness carried out by different methods. About 20 years before due to clinical signs we can make a decision about the severity degree of disease, patients health status. However, now it is not enough. The most important lack of this approach is that in this situation patient’s opinion is neglected. Development of medicine, changing of relationship between patients and doctors give birth to a new direction: unilateral approach replaced by mutual cooperation both of sides. Until the last decades of XX century all treatment results, both conservative and surgical, were evaluated due to the clinical, laboratory and instrumental investigations. As officials defined by the World Health Organization, health is a state of complete physical, mental and social wellbeing [6]. So, during the patient’s conditions assessment all these parameters should investigate. Firstly, Errington in 1966 gave an idea about using quality of life for the describing disease effects. Officials this terming in medicine was established in 1977 [3]. Since that time “Quality of life” used widely in the medicine. Today this is one of the common, convenient and informative methods, which allow physicians assess the patient’s status by following the main rule of medicine- to treat the patient, not the disease [2,4,5]. Its advantages are:
Comprehensiveness - it covers all aspects of health Dynamism- allow to monitoring patients status Patients participation- this is the main benefit.
目前,对治疗效果的评价方法多种多样。大约在20年前,由于临床症状,我们可以决定疾病的严重程度,患者的健康状况。然而,现在还不够。这种方法最重要的不足是,在这种情况下,病人的意见被忽视。医学的发展,医患关系的变化,产生了一个新的方向:单方的做法被双方的相互合作所取代。直到20世纪最后几十年,所有的治疗结果,无论是保守的还是手术的,都是通过临床、实验室和仪器检查来评估的。按照世界卫生组织(World Health Organization)的定义,健康是一种身体、精神和社会完全健康的状态。因此,在对患者进行病情评估时,应调查所有这些参数。首先,Errington在1966年提出了用生活质量来描述疾病影响的想法。官方在医学上的这个称呼是在1977年建立的。从那时起,“生活质量”在医学上被广泛使用。今天,这是一种常见的、方便的、信息丰富的方法,它使医生能够按照医学的主要原则——治疗病人,而不是疾病——来评估病人的状态[2,4,5]。它的优点是:全面性——它涵盖了健康的所有方面,动态性——允许监测病人的状态,病人的参与——这是主要的好处。