Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in Australian burns patients

Patrick Lu, D. Holden, A. Padiglione, H. Cleland
{"title":"Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in Australian burns patients","authors":"Patrick Lu, D. Holden, A. Padiglione, H. Cleland","doi":"10.34239/ajops.v5n1.286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is perceived to reduce intraoperative bacteraemia and prevent surgical site infections, however, the evidence for its use in burns surgery is limited. Excessive use of perioperative antibiotics has become a growing concern. The authors aimed to audit the prescribing practices of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis at the Victorian Adult Burns Service and determine whether the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis influenced the risk of postoperative wound infection, bacte-raemia and antibiotic resistance.\nMethods: This retrospective chart review included all acute adult burns patients who had an operation between November 2018 and November 2019. Basic demographic data, burn specific data and data on perioperative antibiotic use were collected. The outcome measures were wound infection, bacteraemia, other infections and presence of resistant organisms. \nResults: Results demonstrated that almost all patients (98.6%) received perioperative antibiotic prophylax-is. In comparison, there was no significant difference between the rate of postoperative wound infection, bacteraemia or antibiotic resistance between patients receiving a short or long course of antibiotics. \nConclusion: The results of our study demonstrate variable use of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis with-in one burns unit. There were many cases of unsubstantiated use of long courses of antibiotics without apparent benefit for clinical outcomes of wound infection or bacteraemia. With the growing concern over antibiotic overuse and development of resistance, there is an increasing need for development of clear guidelines for antibiotic use in burns surgery.","PeriodicalId":264055,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34239/ajops.v5n1.286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is perceived to reduce intraoperative bacteraemia and prevent surgical site infections, however, the evidence for its use in burns surgery is limited. Excessive use of perioperative antibiotics has become a growing concern. The authors aimed to audit the prescribing practices of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis at the Victorian Adult Burns Service and determine whether the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis influenced the risk of postoperative wound infection, bacte-raemia and antibiotic resistance. Methods: This retrospective chart review included all acute adult burns patients who had an operation between November 2018 and November 2019. Basic demographic data, burn specific data and data on perioperative antibiotic use were collected. The outcome measures were wound infection, bacteraemia, other infections and presence of resistant organisms. Results: Results demonstrated that almost all patients (98.6%) received perioperative antibiotic prophylax-is. In comparison, there was no significant difference between the rate of postoperative wound infection, bacteraemia or antibiotic resistance between patients receiving a short or long course of antibiotics. Conclusion: The results of our study demonstrate variable use of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis with-in one burns unit. There were many cases of unsubstantiated use of long courses of antibiotics without apparent benefit for clinical outcomes of wound infection or bacteraemia. With the growing concern over antibiotic overuse and development of resistance, there is an increasing need for development of clear guidelines for antibiotic use in burns surgery.
澳大利亚烧伤患者围手术期抗生素预防
背景:围手术期抗生素预防被认为可以减少术中菌血症和预防手术部位感染,然而,其在烧伤手术中的应用证据有限。围手术期抗生素的过度使用已成为人们日益关注的问题。作者旨在审核维多利亚成人烧伤服务中心围手术期抗生素预防的处方做法,并确定抗生素预防的持续时间是否影响术后伤口感染、细菌贫血和抗生素耐药性的风险。方法:本回顾性图表回顾包括2018年11月至2019年11月期间接受手术的所有急性成人烧伤患者。收集基本人口统计资料、烧伤特异性资料及围手术期抗生素使用资料。结局指标为伤口感染、菌血症、其他感染和耐药菌的存在。结果:几乎所有患者(98.6%)接受了围手术期抗生素预防治疗。相比之下,接受短期或长期抗生素治疗的患者在术后伤口感染、菌血症和抗生素耐药性方面没有显著差异。结论:我们的研究结果表明围手术期抗生素预防在一个烧伤单位的不同使用。有许多未经证实的使用长疗程抗生素的病例,对伤口感染或菌血症的临床结果没有明显的益处。随着对抗生素过度使用和耐药性的日益关注,越来越需要制定烧伤手术中抗生素使用的明确指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信