Education Matters: Certified health professionals have higher credibility than non health professionals on Instagram

Brandi S. Goddard, A. Black, Sophie Desroches, M. Fernandez, K. Raine
{"title":"Education Matters: Certified health professionals have higher credibility than non health professionals on Instagram","authors":"Brandi S. Goddard, A. Black, Sophie Desroches, M. Fernandez, K. Raine","doi":"10.29173/aar51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media serves as an accessible source of health information and nutrition information. Instagram, an internationally known social media platform with an average of more than 1 billion monthly active users, allows its users to create and share content. However, the credibility of the nutrition content created by users with unknown qualifications may be questionable. The objective of this study is to assess the credibility of content created by nutrition influencers on Instagram by comparing health professionals with non-health professionals. \n For this study, “influencer” is defined as an Instagram user with at least 15,000 followers who promotes products, services, or ideas and who creates nutrition- or health-related content. For each influencer (n=29), two posts were selected every month from August 2018 to July 2019. Using the “Credible Information Factsheet” from the Dietitians of Canada, a credibility score based on four dichotomous criteria was created. Looking at the 24 posts of each influencer holistically, a credibility score out of 4 was calculated, with 0 being the least credible and 4 being the most credible. \n Without exception, a greater proportion of health professionals compared to non-health professionals met each criterion from the “Credible Information Factsheet”. 92% of the health professionals met criteria 1 (Miracle Cure) compared to only 31% of non-health professionals. This demonstrates how the vast majority of health professionals would not promise a miracle cure, while most non-health professionals would readily promise a miracle cure. Additionally, 46% of health professionals met criteria 4 (Research-based) compared to only 19% of non-health professionals, which demonstrates how non-health professionals do not support claims with research. When looking at the total credibility scores for health professionals and non-health professionals, not a single health professional scored a total of 0, while not a single non-health professional scored a total of 4. Most importantly, health professionals had an average credibility score of 2.4, which is twice as high as that of non-health professionals (1.2). \n Overall, health professionals appeared to be more credible than non-health professionals. By viewing nutrition information posted on Instagram by non-health professionals, followers potentially expose themselves to misinformation. Further research should be undertaken to validate the credibility score based on the “Credible Information Factsheet” by determining how adept the factsheet is at differentiating credibility for Instagram content.","PeriodicalId":239812,"journal":{"name":"Alberta Academic Review","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alberta Academic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/aar51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social media serves as an accessible source of health information and nutrition information. Instagram, an internationally known social media platform with an average of more than 1 billion monthly active users, allows its users to create and share content. However, the credibility of the nutrition content created by users with unknown qualifications may be questionable. The objective of this study is to assess the credibility of content created by nutrition influencers on Instagram by comparing health professionals with non-health professionals.  For this study, “influencer” is defined as an Instagram user with at least 15,000 followers who promotes products, services, or ideas and who creates nutrition- or health-related content. For each influencer (n=29), two posts were selected every month from August 2018 to July 2019. Using the “Credible Information Factsheet” from the Dietitians of Canada, a credibility score based on four dichotomous criteria was created. Looking at the 24 posts of each influencer holistically, a credibility score out of 4 was calculated, with 0 being the least credible and 4 being the most credible.  Without exception, a greater proportion of health professionals compared to non-health professionals met each criterion from the “Credible Information Factsheet”. 92% of the health professionals met criteria 1 (Miracle Cure) compared to only 31% of non-health professionals. This demonstrates how the vast majority of health professionals would not promise a miracle cure, while most non-health professionals would readily promise a miracle cure. Additionally, 46% of health professionals met criteria 4 (Research-based) compared to only 19% of non-health professionals, which demonstrates how non-health professionals do not support claims with research. When looking at the total credibility scores for health professionals and non-health professionals, not a single health professional scored a total of 0, while not a single non-health professional scored a total of 4. Most importantly, health professionals had an average credibility score of 2.4, which is twice as high as that of non-health professionals (1.2).  Overall, health professionals appeared to be more credible than non-health professionals. By viewing nutrition information posted on Instagram by non-health professionals, followers potentially expose themselves to misinformation. Further research should be undertaken to validate the credibility score based on the “Credible Information Factsheet” by determining how adept the factsheet is at differentiating credibility for Instagram content.
教育问题:经过认证的健康专业人员在Instagram上的可信度高于非健康专业人员
社交媒体是健康信息和营养信息的可访问来源。Instagram是一个国际知名的社交媒体平台,每月平均活跃用户超过10亿,允许用户创建和分享内容。然而,由资质不明的用户制作的营养成分的可信度可能值得怀疑。本研究的目的是通过比较健康专业人员和非健康专业人员来评估Instagram上营养影响者创建的内容的可信度。在这项研究中,“网红”被定义为拥有至少1.5万名粉丝的Instagram用户,他们推广产品、服务或想法,并创作营养或健康相关的内容。对于每个网红(n=29),从2018年8月到2019年7月每月选出两篇帖子。使用来自加拿大营养师的“可信信息简报”,基于四个二分标准创建了一个可信度评分。从整体上看每个网红的24条帖子,计算可信度得分,满分为4分,其中0分代表最不可信,4分代表最可信。毫无例外,与非卫生专业人员相比,卫生专业人员符合"可靠信息概况介绍"各项标准的比例更高。92%的卫生专业人员符合标准1(奇迹治疗),而非卫生专业人员只有31%符合标准。这表明,绝大多数卫生专业人员不会承诺奇迹治疗,而大多数非卫生专业人员会欣然承诺奇迹治疗。此外,46%的卫生专业人员符合标准4(基于研究),而非卫生专业人员的这一比例仅为19%,这表明非卫生专业人员不支持有研究的主张。当查看卫生专业人员和非卫生专业人员的总可信度得分时,没有一个卫生专业人员得分为0,而没有一个非卫生专业人员得分为4。最重要的是,卫生专业人员的平均可信度得分为2.4,是非卫生专业人员(1.2)的两倍。总体而言,卫生专业人员似乎比非卫生专业人员更可信。通过查看非健康专业人士在Instagram上发布的营养信息,关注者可能会暴露在错误信息中。应该进行进一步的研究,通过确定“可信信息简报”在区分Instagram内容可信度方面的熟练程度,来验证基于“可信信息简报”的可信度评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信