Identification of opinion leader on rumor spreading in online social network Twitter using edge weighting and centrality measure weighting

Fatia Kusuma Dewi, S. Yudhoatmojo, I. Budi
{"title":"Identification of opinion leader on rumor spreading in online social network Twitter using edge weighting and centrality measure weighting","authors":"Fatia Kusuma Dewi, S. Yudhoatmojo, I. Budi","doi":"10.1109/ICDIM.2017.8244680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rumor spreading has been an essential issue for society. One of the platforms for rumor spreading is Twitter. Finding the opinion leader of its issue is also important in order to know who are users whom have a high impact of bringing the issue. So we can give the suggestion to the law authority to give the right authorization afterward. Opinion leader can be found using centrality measure metric on social network analysis study. This study has node and edge as its property. For recent years, there are many conducted researches about centrality measure. Some of them are combining some centrality measures together. Aside from defining the centrality measure, defining the edge is also important. Twitter has a different kind of relationships that can be turned into an edge, but not all the relationships have the same impact for spreading the rumor. This study conduct two experiments, first experiment is edge weighting. This experiment is aimed to see the importance of each defined edge type for finding the opinion leader. The second experiment is centrality weighting. This experiment is aimed to see the weight that could give more accurate opinion leader based on other evaluation algorithms. The study found the edge that has the ability to spread to wider audience (quote, retweet, and reply) tend to have a bigger impact for finding opinion leader than mention relationship. The study also finds that a low in-degree weight, high betweenness weight, and low or no PageRank weight could give 100% agreement upon other evaluation algorithms for finding the opinion leader.","PeriodicalId":144953,"journal":{"name":"2017 Twelfth International Conference on Digital Information Management (ICDIM)","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Twelfth International Conference on Digital Information Management (ICDIM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDIM.2017.8244680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Rumor spreading has been an essential issue for society. One of the platforms for rumor spreading is Twitter. Finding the opinion leader of its issue is also important in order to know who are users whom have a high impact of bringing the issue. So we can give the suggestion to the law authority to give the right authorization afterward. Opinion leader can be found using centrality measure metric on social network analysis study. This study has node and edge as its property. For recent years, there are many conducted researches about centrality measure. Some of them are combining some centrality measures together. Aside from defining the centrality measure, defining the edge is also important. Twitter has a different kind of relationships that can be turned into an edge, but not all the relationships have the same impact for spreading the rumor. This study conduct two experiments, first experiment is edge weighting. This experiment is aimed to see the importance of each defined edge type for finding the opinion leader. The second experiment is centrality weighting. This experiment is aimed to see the weight that could give more accurate opinion leader based on other evaluation algorithms. The study found the edge that has the ability to spread to wider audience (quote, retweet, and reply) tend to have a bigger impact for finding opinion leader than mention relationship. The study also finds that a low in-degree weight, high betweenness weight, and low or no PageRank weight could give 100% agreement upon other evaluation algorithms for finding the opinion leader.
利用边缘加权和中心性度量加权识别社交网络Twitter谣言传播的意见领袖
谣言传播一直是社会的一个基本问题。推特是谣言传播的平台之一。找到问题的意见领袖也很重要,这样才能知道谁是对问题产生重大影响的用户。因此,我们可以建议法律当局在事后给予权利授权。在社会网络分析研究中,可以使用中心性度量度量来发现意见领袖。本研究具有节点和边的性质。近年来,关于中心性测度的研究较多。其中一些将一些中心性指标结合在一起。除了定义中心性度量之外,定义边缘也很重要。Twitter有一种不同的关系,可以转化为优势,但并不是所有的关系对传播谣言都有同样的影响。本研究进行了两个实验,第一个实验是边加权。这个实验的目的是看到每个定义的边缘类型对于寻找意见领袖的重要性。第二个实验是中心性加权。本实验旨在观察在其他评价算法的基础上,能给出更准确意见领袖的权重。研究发现,能够传播给更广泛受众的优势(引用、转发和回复)往往比提及关系对找到意见领袖的影响更大。研究还发现,在寻找意见领袖时,低关联度权重、高中间度权重和低或无PageRank权重可以与其他评价算法达成100%的一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信