The business sector in Southeast Europe–stimulating activity vs. conforming to EU norms

P. Hare
{"title":"The business sector in Southeast Europe–stimulating activity vs. conforming to EU norms","authors":"P. Hare","doi":"10.1080/14613190600595549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the present paper, Southeast Europe refers to the following list of states: Albania, Bulgaria, Romania; from the former Yugoslavia: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (often referred to as FYR Macedonia, or FYROM; or simply as the Republic of Macedonia), and the federation of Serbia and Montenegro; and Moldova. These states have experienced extremely diverse histories since the fall of communism, including the most severe ethnic conflict seen in Europe since the Second World War, various degrees of economic collapse and recovery, and rather mixed fortunes in terms of building stable and effective states. Given this background, the international community, together with these eight countries, has established a Stability Pact to foster a long-term conflict prevention strategy in the region. Table 1 presents a summary set of recent macroeconomic statistics for each country. Though currently growing rather faster than the CEB countries (Central Europe and the Baltics) that joined the EU in May 2004, the political strife and economic policy failures of the 1990s are clearly visible in the column of Table 1 showing real GDP in 2003 as a percentage of that in 1989. To a significant extent, current high growth might simply reflect recovery from the initial postcommunist economic collapse (and subsequent crises). It is debatable how sustainable it is unless accompanied by large increases in new investment. There is evidently much catching up to be done, with the exception of Albania which bounced back very rapidly from its mid-1990s economic and political crisis. On most of the other economic indicators shown in Table 1, other than the general government balance, the SEE countries are generally in a rather less favourable position than the CEB countries. It is important to bear these very significant differences in performance in mind in the subsequent discussion.","PeriodicalId":313717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14613190600595549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For the present paper, Southeast Europe refers to the following list of states: Albania, Bulgaria, Romania; from the former Yugoslavia: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (often referred to as FYR Macedonia, or FYROM; or simply as the Republic of Macedonia), and the federation of Serbia and Montenegro; and Moldova. These states have experienced extremely diverse histories since the fall of communism, including the most severe ethnic conflict seen in Europe since the Second World War, various degrees of economic collapse and recovery, and rather mixed fortunes in terms of building stable and effective states. Given this background, the international community, together with these eight countries, has established a Stability Pact to foster a long-term conflict prevention strategy in the region. Table 1 presents a summary set of recent macroeconomic statistics for each country. Though currently growing rather faster than the CEB countries (Central Europe and the Baltics) that joined the EU in May 2004, the political strife and economic policy failures of the 1990s are clearly visible in the column of Table 1 showing real GDP in 2003 as a percentage of that in 1989. To a significant extent, current high growth might simply reflect recovery from the initial postcommunist economic collapse (and subsequent crises). It is debatable how sustainable it is unless accompanied by large increases in new investment. There is evidently much catching up to be done, with the exception of Albania which bounced back very rapidly from its mid-1990s economic and political crisis. On most of the other economic indicators shown in Table 1, other than the general government balance, the SEE countries are generally in a rather less favourable position than the CEB countries. It is important to bear these very significant differences in performance in mind in the subsequent discussion.
东南欧的商业部门——刺激活动vs.遵守欧盟规范
就本文件而言,东南欧是指下列国家名单:阿尔巴尼亚、保加利亚、罗马尼亚;来自前南斯拉夫:波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那,克罗地亚,前南斯拉夫的马其顿共和国(通常被称为FYR马其顿,或FYROM);或者简称为马其顿共和国),以及塞尔维亚和黑山联邦;和摩尔多瓦。自共产主义垮台以来,这些国家经历了极其不同的历史,包括自第二次世界大战以来欧洲最严重的种族冲突,不同程度的经济崩溃和复苏,以及在建立稳定和有效的国家方面相当复杂的命运。在这种背景下,国际社会与这八个国家一起建立了一项《稳定公约》,以促进该区域的一项长期预防冲突战略。表1概述了各国最近的宏观经济统计数字。尽管目前的增长速度比2004年5月加入欧盟的CEB国家(中欧和波罗的海国家)要快得多,但从表1中显示2003年实际GDP占1989年实际GDP百分比的列中,可以清楚地看到20世纪90年代的政治冲突和经济政策失败。在很大程度上,当前的高增长可能只是反映了从最初的后共产主义经济崩溃(以及随后的危机)中复苏。除非伴随着新投资的大幅增加,否则这种模式的可持续性值得商榷。显然,除了阿尔巴尼亚从20世纪90年代中期的经济和政治危机中迅速反弹之外,还有很多事情要做。在表1所示的大多数其他经济指标上,除了一般政府平衡外,SEE国家的处境一般不如行政首长协调会国家有利。在接下来的讨论中,记住这些非常重要的性能差异是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信