Comparison between the two methods of optimization: Genetic algorithm (GA) and ant colony algorithm (ACO) for the propulsion system of UAV

Mohammed Khashan, Dhamyaa S. Khudhur, H. Balla
{"title":"Comparison between the two methods of optimization: Genetic algorithm (GA) and ant colony algorithm (ACO) for the propulsion system of UAV","authors":"Mohammed Khashan, Dhamyaa S. Khudhur, H. Balla","doi":"10.30772/qjes.v16i2.861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A propeller generates lift in the direction of revolution, similar to a revolving wing. Many previous propeller optimization techniques exist; nevertheless, they often find the optimal thrust coefficient at a constant power coefficient and vice versa. Using two types of algorithms, the genetic algorithm (GA), and the ant colony algorithm (ACO), and comparing with each other, this study will discover the optimal value of the thrust coefficient and the power coefficient combined to obtain the optimum value of the thrust and the lowest value of the power at the same time. A Simple Blade Element Theory Blade served as the foundation for all assumptions. This article examined over 80 various designs, brands, and types of propellers in a 2-blade configuration with diameters ranging from 2.5 to 19 inches and varying pitch values. The data for the baseline propeller was obtained from the UIUC Propeller Database. The inputs for the optimization are the propeller type, diameter, pitch angle, rotational speed, thrust coefficient, and power coefficient. The results show that by determining the factor of interest in the thrust coefficient (FITC), the algorithm can find the optimal propeller specifications. When the (FITC) is 100%, the algorithm will ignore the effect of the power coefficient and vice versa. In the instance (FITC) is 100 percent, the genetic algorithm performed much better than the ant colony algorithm (ACO). But the Ant colony algorithm is more accurate than the genetic algorithm.","PeriodicalId":227530,"journal":{"name":"Al-Qadisiyah Journal for Engineering Sciences","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Qadisiyah Journal for Engineering Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30772/qjes.v16i2.861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A propeller generates lift in the direction of revolution, similar to a revolving wing. Many previous propeller optimization techniques exist; nevertheless, they often find the optimal thrust coefficient at a constant power coefficient and vice versa. Using two types of algorithms, the genetic algorithm (GA), and the ant colony algorithm (ACO), and comparing with each other, this study will discover the optimal value of the thrust coefficient and the power coefficient combined to obtain the optimum value of the thrust and the lowest value of the power at the same time. A Simple Blade Element Theory Blade served as the foundation for all assumptions. This article examined over 80 various designs, brands, and types of propellers in a 2-blade configuration with diameters ranging from 2.5 to 19 inches and varying pitch values. The data for the baseline propeller was obtained from the UIUC Propeller Database. The inputs for the optimization are the propeller type, diameter, pitch angle, rotational speed, thrust coefficient, and power coefficient. The results show that by determining the factor of interest in the thrust coefficient (FITC), the algorithm can find the optimal propeller specifications. When the (FITC) is 100%, the algorithm will ignore the effect of the power coefficient and vice versa. In the instance (FITC) is 100 percent, the genetic algorithm performed much better than the ant colony algorithm (ACO). But the Ant colony algorithm is more accurate than the genetic algorithm.
对无人机推进系统的遗传算法和蚁群算法两种优化方法进行比较
螺旋桨在旋转的方向上产生升力,类似于旋转的机翼。先前存在许多螺旋桨优化技术;然而,他们经常在恒定的功率系数下找到最佳推力系数,反之亦然。本研究将采用遗传算法(GA)和蚁群算法(ACO)两种算法进行比较,找出推力系数和功率系数组合的最优值,同时求得推力的最优值和功率的最小值。一个简单的叶片元素理论叶片是所有假设的基础。本文研究了80多种不同的设计,品牌和类型的螺旋桨在2叶片配置直径范围从2.5到19英寸和不同的螺距值。基线螺旋桨的数据来自UIUC螺旋桨数据库。优化的输入为螺旋桨类型、直径、俯仰角、转速、推力系数和功率系数。结果表明,通过确定推力系数中的兴趣因子(FITC),该算法可以找到最优的螺旋桨规格。当(FITC)为100%时,算法将忽略功率系数的影响,反之亦然。在FITC为100%的情况下,遗传算法比蚁群算法(ACO)的表现要好得多。但蚁群算法比遗传算法更精确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信