Love for the Colonizer: Literary and Psychoanalytic Investigations of Brazil's Foundational Trauma

Francisco Attié
{"title":"Love for the Colonizer: Literary and Psychoanalytic Investigations of Brazil's Foundational Trauma","authors":"Francisco Attié","doi":"10.33682/mn24-v7av","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Brazilian cultural and political project began in 1822 with the end of colonization. At its outset, colonization stood fictitious in its enormous power to shape reality. In Latin America there was a confluence between the politicians and writers of the 19th century that guaranteed wholly pervasive foundational mythologies—the people building the legal-political state were also setting the mythological ideology of the nation in stone. As such, foundational myths served to unify the people under a common national banner. However, in their attempts to overcome the ghost of colonization, they ended up guaranteeing a wholly pervasive structure wherein the repressed trauma could fester. In Brazil, foundational works, like José de Alencar's Iracema, instead of rejecting the trauma of colonization, engendered myths that repressed it, romanticizing a narrative for the people to fall in love with their colonizer. This love, I argue, led to a specific cultural complex that induces a repetition compulsion of the original traumatic event up to this day, guaranteeing unconscious entrapment and a constant return and submission to the figure of the colonizer.","PeriodicalId":119819,"journal":{"name":"The Interdependent: Journal of Undergraduate Research in Global Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Interdependent: Journal of Undergraduate Research in Global Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33682/mn24-v7av","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Brazilian cultural and political project began in 1822 with the end of colonization. At its outset, colonization stood fictitious in its enormous power to shape reality. In Latin America there was a confluence between the politicians and writers of the 19th century that guaranteed wholly pervasive foundational mythologies—the people building the legal-political state were also setting the mythological ideology of the nation in stone. As such, foundational myths served to unify the people under a common national banner. However, in their attempts to overcome the ghost of colonization, they ended up guaranteeing a wholly pervasive structure wherein the repressed trauma could fester. In Brazil, foundational works, like José de Alencar's Iracema, instead of rejecting the trauma of colonization, engendered myths that repressed it, romanticizing a narrative for the people to fall in love with their colonizer. This love, I argue, led to a specific cultural complex that induces a repetition compulsion of the original traumatic event up to this day, guaranteeing unconscious entrapment and a constant return and submission to the figure of the colonizer.
对殖民者的爱:巴西基础创伤的文学和精神分析调查
巴西的文化和政治项目始于1822年殖民结束。从一开始,殖民就以其塑造现实的巨大力量而显得虚幻。在拉丁美洲,19世纪的政治家和作家之间有一种融合,这种融合保证了完全普遍的基础神话——建立法治政治国家的人们也将民族的神话意识形态固定在石头上。因此,基本神话有助于将人民团结在一个共同的国家旗帜下。然而,在他们试图克服殖民幽灵的过程中,他们最终保证了一个完全无处不在的结构,在这个结构中,被压抑的创伤可能会溃烂。在巴西,像约瑟·德·阿伦卡尔的《伊拉西马》这样的奠基性作品,并没有拒绝殖民的创伤,而是产生了压抑它的神话,将人们爱上殖民者的叙事浪漫化。我认为,这种爱导致了一种特殊的文化情结,这种情结导致了对原始创伤事件的重复强迫,直到今天,它保证了无意识的束缚,以及对殖民者形象的不断回归和服从。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信