Forming a Typology for “Social Innovation”

M. Premadasa, K. Jayawardhana, Hirusha Amarawansha, Sewwandika Gamage, I. Fernando, J. Siyambalapitiya
{"title":"Forming a Typology for “Social Innovation”","authors":"M. Premadasa, K. Jayawardhana, Hirusha Amarawansha, Sewwandika Gamage, I. Fernando, J. Siyambalapitiya","doi":"10.1109/fiti54902.2021.9833048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social Innovation (SI) makes a clear departure from commercial innovations in their scope and persistence. Though social innovation research has received increased attention from researchers in the last decade, the concept is not free from conceptual ambiguities. Thus, the overarching objective of this study is to form a typology for SI. A qualitative research paradigm is adopted in this study based on the nature of the study phenomena. The study adopted the maximum variation sampling strategy to derive the study sample and interviews were conducted with 24 Sri Lankan social enterprises. The data were thematically analyzed, and theoretically positioned the typology based on two building blocks: a) efficiency and b) effectiveness of social enterprises. Subsequently, the paper explored three types of efficiency-based SIs, namely, a) market efficiency-based SIs, b) organizational efficiency-based SIs, and, c) mission efficiency-based SIs. The three types of effectiveness-based SIs are a) market effectiveness-based SIs, b) organizational effectiveness-based SIs, and, c) mission effectiveness-based SIs. By doing so, the study provides significant implications for SI theory, practice, and policymaking.","PeriodicalId":201458,"journal":{"name":"2021 From Innovation To Impact (FITI)","volume":"48 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 From Innovation To Impact (FITI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/fiti54902.2021.9833048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social Innovation (SI) makes a clear departure from commercial innovations in their scope and persistence. Though social innovation research has received increased attention from researchers in the last decade, the concept is not free from conceptual ambiguities. Thus, the overarching objective of this study is to form a typology for SI. A qualitative research paradigm is adopted in this study based on the nature of the study phenomena. The study adopted the maximum variation sampling strategy to derive the study sample and interviews were conducted with 24 Sri Lankan social enterprises. The data were thematically analyzed, and theoretically positioned the typology based on two building blocks: a) efficiency and b) effectiveness of social enterprises. Subsequently, the paper explored three types of efficiency-based SIs, namely, a) market efficiency-based SIs, b) organizational efficiency-based SIs, and, c) mission efficiency-based SIs. The three types of effectiveness-based SIs are a) market effectiveness-based SIs, b) organizational effectiveness-based SIs, and, c) mission effectiveness-based SIs. By doing so, the study provides significant implications for SI theory, practice, and policymaking.
形成“社会创新”的类型学
社会创新(SI)在范围和持久性方面与商业创新有明显的区别。虽然近十年来社会创新研究受到了越来越多的研究者的关注,但这个概念并没有摆脱概念上的歧义。因此,本研究的首要目标是形成科学探究的类型学。根据研究现象的性质,本研究采用定性研究范式。本研究采用最大变异抽样策略推导研究样本,并对24家斯里兰卡社会企业进行访谈。对数据进行了主题分析,并根据社会企业的两个组成部分(a)效率和b)有效性)对类型学进行了理论定位。随后,本文探讨了三种基于效率的SIs,即a)基于市场效率的SIs, b)基于组织效率的SIs, c)基于任务效率的SIs。基于有效性的绩效评估有三种类型:a)基于市场有效性的绩效评估,b)基于组织有效性的绩效评估,c)基于任务有效性的绩效评估。通过这样做,本研究为科学科学的理论、实践和政策制定提供了重要的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信