Watchmen and Speculating on the Future of the Humanities

J. Miranda, J. Turner
{"title":"Watchmen and Speculating on the Future of the Humanities","authors":"J. Miranda, J. Turner","doi":"10.1353/ink.2020.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons' comic book Watchmen speculates on possible future relationships between the humanities and the sciences. Watchmen offers four versions of how scientific and humanistic knowledges might play out including anticipating the challenges facing the humanities in light of a future tied to techno-scientific and financial speculation. Drawing on the aesthetic qualities of speculative fiction to interrogate a future conceived, produced, and determined by the sciences, Watchmen draws attention to the epistemological limitations of scientific knowledge and the potential of the humanities to disclose a different kind of truth: what is sui generis and miraculous about humanity. While speculative, Watchmen suggests that the reevaluation of knowledge that resulted in prioritizing science over the humanities during the twentieth century, the gap that grew between these two forms of knowledge, as well as the efforts to reconcile science with the humanities, have failed to bring about a vision of a unified and peaceful world. Despite this failure, or perhaps in its aftermath, Watchmen suggests the humanities are destined to reappear in order to disclose a truth marginalized by a scientific future.","PeriodicalId":392545,"journal":{"name":"Inks: The Journal of the Comics Studies Society","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inks: The Journal of the Comics Studies Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ink.2020.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons' comic book Watchmen speculates on possible future relationships between the humanities and the sciences. Watchmen offers four versions of how scientific and humanistic knowledges might play out including anticipating the challenges facing the humanities in light of a future tied to techno-scientific and financial speculation. Drawing on the aesthetic qualities of speculative fiction to interrogate a future conceived, produced, and determined by the sciences, Watchmen draws attention to the epistemological limitations of scientific knowledge and the potential of the humanities to disclose a different kind of truth: what is sui generis and miraculous about humanity. While speculative, Watchmen suggests that the reevaluation of knowledge that resulted in prioritizing science over the humanities during the twentieth century, the gap that grew between these two forms of knowledge, as well as the efforts to reconcile science with the humanities, have failed to bring about a vision of a unified and peaceful world. Despite this failure, or perhaps in its aftermath, Watchmen suggests the humanities are destined to reappear in order to disclose a truth marginalized by a scientific future.
守望者和对人文学科未来的推测
摘要:艾伦·摩尔和戴夫·吉本斯的漫画《守望者》推测了人文科学与科学之间可能的未来关系。《守望者》提供了四种科学和人文知识可能如何发展的版本,包括根据与科技和金融投机有关的未来,预测人文学科面临的挑战。《守望者》利用思辨小说的美学特质,对由科学构思、生产和决定的未来提出质疑,将人们的注意力吸引到科学知识的认识论局限性和人文学科揭示另一种真理的潜力上:人类的独特性和奇迹。尽管是推测性的,但《守望者》认为,在20世纪,对知识的重新评估导致科学优先于人文,这两种知识形式之间的差距,以及调和科学与人文的努力,都未能带来一个统一与和平的世界的愿景。尽管失败了,或者在失败之后,《守望者》认为,人文学科注定要重新出现,以揭示被科学未来边缘化的真相。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信