Indigenous Fathering and Wellbeing: Kinship and Decolonial Approaches to Health Research

L. Hall, T. Shute, P. Nangia, Mikaela Parr, P. Montgomery, Sharolyn Mossey
{"title":"Indigenous Fathering and Wellbeing: Kinship and Decolonial Approaches to Health Research","authors":"L. Hall, T. Shute, P. Nangia, Mikaela Parr, P. Montgomery, Sharolyn Mossey","doi":"10.28984/DRHJ.V3I0.303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the past decade, Canadian statistics indicate that fathering nurtures family wellbeing which ultimately fosters community growth. The wellbeing of Indigenous men, shaped by determinants of health and culture-based perspectives, is challenged by ongoing settler colonialism. In particular to Indigenous men living with children in their homes, less is known about their strengths as nurturers. For the purpose of this study, based on Indigenist, decolonizing theories, 'father' is not conceived as the head of household. An alternative to the heteropatriarchal model is the kinship orientation of Indigenous fathering and as such, father refers to uncle, grandfather, traditional Clan leader, adoptive parent, and so on. This study's secondary quantitative analysis  compared health and social characteristics of three cohorts of Indigenous adult men who identify as residing with children. Based on an extracted subset of variables from the 2012 Aboriginal Peoples Survey, results showed many significance comparisons among First Nations, Metis and Inuit men. Across health and social domains, multiple and decolonial supports are needed for Indigenous fathering to flourish.","PeriodicalId":399325,"journal":{"name":"Diversity of Research in Health Journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity of Research in Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28984/DRHJ.V3I0.303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the past decade, Canadian statistics indicate that fathering nurtures family wellbeing which ultimately fosters community growth. The wellbeing of Indigenous men, shaped by determinants of health and culture-based perspectives, is challenged by ongoing settler colonialism. In particular to Indigenous men living with children in their homes, less is known about their strengths as nurturers. For the purpose of this study, based on Indigenist, decolonizing theories, 'father' is not conceived as the head of household. An alternative to the heteropatriarchal model is the kinship orientation of Indigenous fathering and as such, father refers to uncle, grandfather, traditional Clan leader, adoptive parent, and so on. This study's secondary quantitative analysis  compared health and social characteristics of three cohorts of Indigenous adult men who identify as residing with children. Based on an extracted subset of variables from the 2012 Aboriginal Peoples Survey, results showed many significance comparisons among First Nations, Metis and Inuit men. Across health and social domains, multiple and decolonial supports are needed for Indigenous fathering to flourish.
土著父亲和福利:亲属关系和非殖民化的健康研究方法
在过去的十年里,加拿大的统计数据表明,父亲养育家庭幸福,最终促进社区发展。土著男子的福祉受到健康决定因素和基于文化的观点的影响,受到持续的定居者殖民主义的挑战。特别是与儿童同住在家中的土著男子,对他们作为养育者的力量所知甚少。为了本研究的目的,根据土著主义和非殖民化理论,“父亲”不被认为是一家之主。异族父权模式的另一种选择是土著父亲的亲属取向,因此,父亲指的是叔叔、祖父、传统的氏族领袖、养父母等等。本研究的二次定量分析比较了三组自认为与儿童同住的土著成年男子的健康和社会特征。根据2012年原住民调查中提取的变量子集,结果显示了第一民族、梅蒂斯人和因纽特人之间的许多显著比较。在整个保健和社会领域,需要多重和非殖民化的支持,以使土著父亲的做法蓬勃发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信