Road to the White House: Analyzing the Relations Between Mainstream and Social Media During the U.S. Presidential Primaries

Aaron Brookhouse, Tyler Derr, Hamid Karimi, H. Bernard, Jiliang Tang
{"title":"Road to the White House: Analyzing the Relations Between Mainstream and Social Media During the U.S. Presidential Primaries","authors":"Aaron Brookhouse, Tyler Derr, Hamid Karimi, H. Bernard, Jiliang Tang","doi":"10.1145/3465336.3475115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Information is crucial to the function of a democratic society where well-informed citizens can make rational political decisions. While in the past political entities primarily utilized newspapers and later radio and television to inform the public, the political arena has transformed into a more complex structure with the rise of the Internet and online social media. Now, more than ever, people express themselves online while mainstream news agencies attempt to utilize the power of the Internet to spread their articles as much as possible. To grasp the political coexistence of mainstream media and online social media, in this paper, we analyze these two sources of information in the context of the U.S. 2020 presidential election. In particular, we collected data during the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries pertaining to the candidates, and, by analyzing this data, we highlight similarities and differences between these two main types of sources, detect the potential impact they have on each other, and understand how this impact relationship can change over time.","PeriodicalId":325072,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3465336.3475115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Information is crucial to the function of a democratic society where well-informed citizens can make rational political decisions. While in the past political entities primarily utilized newspapers and later radio and television to inform the public, the political arena has transformed into a more complex structure with the rise of the Internet and online social media. Now, more than ever, people express themselves online while mainstream news agencies attempt to utilize the power of the Internet to spread their articles as much as possible. To grasp the political coexistence of mainstream media and online social media, in this paper, we analyze these two sources of information in the context of the U.S. 2020 presidential election. In particular, we collected data during the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries pertaining to the candidates, and, by analyzing this data, we highlight similarities and differences between these two main types of sources, detect the potential impact they have on each other, and understand how this impact relationship can change over time.
通往白宫之路:美国总统初选中主流媒体与社交媒体的关系分析
信息对民主社会的功能至关重要,在民主社会中,消息灵通的公民可以做出理性的政治决定。在过去,政治实体主要利用报纸和后来的广播和电视来告知公众,随着互联网和在线社交媒体的兴起,政治舞台已经转变为一个更加复杂的结构。现在,人们比以往任何时候都更喜欢在网上表达自己,而主流新闻机构则试图利用互联网的力量尽可能多地传播他们的文章。为了把握主流媒体和网络社交媒体的政治共存,本文将这两种信息来源置于2020年美国总统大选的背景下进行分析。特别是,我们收集了2020年民主党总统初选期间与候选人有关的数据,并通过分析这些数据,我们突出了这两种主要来源之间的异同,检测它们彼此之间的潜在影响,并了解这种影响关系如何随着时间的推移而变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信