Effect on Detection and False Alarm Probabilities For Various Amplitude Modulation Techniques

M. F. Nasir, Ahmad Ali, Wasib Javed, Asim Altaf Shah, Junaid Imtiaz
{"title":"Effect on Detection and False Alarm Probabilities For Various Amplitude Modulation Techniques","authors":"M. F. Nasir, Ahmad Ali, Wasib Javed, Asim Altaf Shah, Junaid Imtiaz","doi":"10.1109/INNOVATIONS.2018.8605999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wireless communication has seen rapid development in the past decade, resulting in a growing demand for radio spectrum. Scarcity and under-utilization of radio spectrum became a major obstacle which needed to be dealt with, in order to achieve further advancements. Cognitive Radio overcame this obstacle and is one of the vibrant solutions. The backbone of cognitive radio is spectrum sensing, conventional energy detector technique is used due to its simplicity and effectiveness. The successful use of cognitive radio depends on the capability of a reporting scheme to sense the spectrum. Soft and Hard spectrum sensing schemes have been put to use, to explore which scheme provides more favorable results. Cognitive radio is defined by two essential metrics which are probability of detection and probability of false alarm. There are several modulation techniques by which amplitude modulated signals are generated, namely DSB, SSB and QAM. A detailed analysis is presented for various amplitude modulation techniques which are subjected to cognitive radio technology. A mathematical model has also been presented that explains how each type of modulation eg. DSB, SSB and QAM directly effect probability of detection and probability of false alarm, while using both hard and soft spectrum sensing schemes. The simulation results show that all techniques have considerably close results, so selecting a technique is entirely dependent on the licensed users situation.","PeriodicalId":319472,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INNOVATIONS.2018.8605999","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wireless communication has seen rapid development in the past decade, resulting in a growing demand for radio spectrum. Scarcity and under-utilization of radio spectrum became a major obstacle which needed to be dealt with, in order to achieve further advancements. Cognitive Radio overcame this obstacle and is one of the vibrant solutions. The backbone of cognitive radio is spectrum sensing, conventional energy detector technique is used due to its simplicity and effectiveness. The successful use of cognitive radio depends on the capability of a reporting scheme to sense the spectrum. Soft and Hard spectrum sensing schemes have been put to use, to explore which scheme provides more favorable results. Cognitive radio is defined by two essential metrics which are probability of detection and probability of false alarm. There are several modulation techniques by which amplitude modulated signals are generated, namely DSB, SSB and QAM. A detailed analysis is presented for various amplitude modulation techniques which are subjected to cognitive radio technology. A mathematical model has also been presented that explains how each type of modulation eg. DSB, SSB and QAM directly effect probability of detection and probability of false alarm, while using both hard and soft spectrum sensing schemes. The simulation results show that all techniques have considerably close results, so selecting a technique is entirely dependent on the licensed users situation.
不同调幅技术对检测和虚警概率的影响
在过去的十年中,无线通信得到了快速发展,对无线电频谱的需求也在不断增长。无线电频谱的稀缺和利用不足成为需要解决的主要障碍,以便取得进一步进展。认知无线电克服了这个障碍,是一个充满活力的解决方案。认知无线电的核心是频谱感知,传统的能量探测技术由于其简单有效而被采用。认知无线电的成功使用取决于报告方案感知频谱的能力。研究了软、硬两种光谱传感方案,探讨了哪种方案效果更好。认知无线电由探测概率和虚警概率两个基本指标来定义。产生调幅信号的调制技术有几种,即DSB、SSB和QAM。对认知无线电技术下的各种调幅技术进行了详细的分析。还提出了一个数学模型来解释每种类型的调制是如何发生的。DSB、SSB和QAM直接影响检测概率和虚警概率,同时采用硬、软两种频谱传感方案。仿真结果表明,所有技术的结果都相当接近,因此选择一种技术完全取决于许可用户的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信