Context effect on query formulation and subjective relevance in health searches

C. Lopes, Cristina Ribeiro
{"title":"Context effect on query formulation and subjective relevance in health searches","authors":"C. Lopes, Cristina Ribeiro","doi":"10.1145/1840784.1840815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is recognized by the Information Retrieval community that context aects the retrieval process. Query formulation and relevance assessment are stages where the user role is central. The first determines what the system will search for and the second is frequently used to evaluate how the system behaved. With a large human involvement, these stages are expected to be largely influenced by user and task characteristics. To analyze the influence of these context features on the specified stages of health information retrieval, we conducted a user study in which we collected user features through two questionnaires. User characteristics include features like age, gender, web search experience, health search experience and familiarity with the medical topic. Task features include the medical specialty, the question type, the task's clarity and the task's easiness. Besides user and task features, the relevance assessment analysis also covered features related to the query and document. We found many variables do indeed aect query formulation and relevance judgment. Some of our results question evaluations using test collections and ask for evaluation models that incorporate other kind of success measures.","PeriodicalId":413481,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Information Interaction in Context","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Information Interaction in Context","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1840784.1840815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

It is recognized by the Information Retrieval community that context aects the retrieval process. Query formulation and relevance assessment are stages where the user role is central. The first determines what the system will search for and the second is frequently used to evaluate how the system behaved. With a large human involvement, these stages are expected to be largely influenced by user and task characteristics. To analyze the influence of these context features on the specified stages of health information retrieval, we conducted a user study in which we collected user features through two questionnaires. User characteristics include features like age, gender, web search experience, health search experience and familiarity with the medical topic. Task features include the medical specialty, the question type, the task's clarity and the task's easiness. Besides user and task features, the relevance assessment analysis also covered features related to the query and document. We found many variables do indeed aect query formulation and relevance judgment. Some of our results question evaluations using test collections and ask for evaluation models that incorporate other kind of success measures.
健康搜索中上下文对查询公式和主观相关性的影响
信息检索界认识到上下文影响检索过程。查询公式和相关性评估是用户角色的中心阶段。第一个决定系统将搜索什么,第二个经常用于评估系统的行为。由于有大量的人员参与,这些阶段预计将在很大程度上受到用户和任务特征的影响。为了分析这些语境特征对健康信息检索特定阶段的影响,我们进行了一项用户研究,通过两份问卷收集用户特征。用户特征包括年龄、性别、网络搜索经验、健康搜索经验以及对医学主题的熟悉程度。任务特点包括医学专业、问题类型、任务的清晰性和任务的易操作性。除了用户和任务特征外,相关性评估分析还涵盖了与查询和文档相关的特征。我们发现许多变量确实影响查询公式和相关性判断。我们的一些结果对使用测试集合的评估提出了质疑,并要求使用包含其他类型成功度量的评估模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信