Shipping to streaming: is this shift green?

A. Seetharam, Manikandan Somasundaram, D. Towsley, J. Kurose, P. Shenoy
{"title":"Shipping to streaming: is this shift green?","authors":"A. Seetharam, Manikandan Somasundaram, D. Towsley, J. Kurose, P. Shenoy","doi":"10.1145/1851290.1851304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Streaming movies over the Internet has become increasingly popular in recent years as an alternative to mailing DVDs to a customer. In this paper we investigate the environmental- and energy-related impacts of these two methods of movie content delivery. We compare the total energy consumed and the carbon footprint impact of these two delivery methods and find that the non-energy optimized streaming of a movie through the Internet consumes approximately 78% of the energy needed to ship a movie, but has a carbon footprint that is approximately 100% higher. However, by taking advantage of recently proposed \"greening of IT\" techniques in the research literature for the serving and transmission of the movie, we find that the energy consumption and carbon footprint of streaming can be reduced to approximately 30% and 65% respectively of that of shipping. We also consider how this tradeoff may change in the future.","PeriodicalId":223413,"journal":{"name":"Green Networking '10","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Green Networking '10","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1851290.1851304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

Streaming movies over the Internet has become increasingly popular in recent years as an alternative to mailing DVDs to a customer. In this paper we investigate the environmental- and energy-related impacts of these two methods of movie content delivery. We compare the total energy consumed and the carbon footprint impact of these two delivery methods and find that the non-energy optimized streaming of a movie through the Internet consumes approximately 78% of the energy needed to ship a movie, but has a carbon footprint that is approximately 100% higher. However, by taking advantage of recently proposed "greening of IT" techniques in the research literature for the serving and transmission of the movie, we find that the energy consumption and carbon footprint of streaming can be reduced to approximately 30% and 65% respectively of that of shipping. We also consider how this tradeoff may change in the future.
向流媒体传输:这种转变是绿色的吗?
近年来,互联网上的流媒体电影越来越流行,成为邮寄dvd给客户的另一种选择。在本文中,我们研究了这两种电影内容传递方式对环境和能源的影响。我们比较了这两种传输方式的总能源消耗和碳足迹影响,发现通过互联网传输电影的非能源优化方式消耗的能源约为电影传输所需能源的78%,但碳足迹却高出约100%。然而,通过利用研究文献中最近提出的“IT绿化”技术来服务和传播电影,我们发现流媒体的能源消耗和碳足迹可以分别减少到运输的30%和65%左右。我们还考虑了这种权衡在未来可能发生的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信