Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Diagnostik Tiga Tingkat untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik pada Materi Pokok Laju Reaksi

Maghfira Arifah, Jusniar Jusniar, M. Anwar
{"title":"Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Diagnostik Tiga Tingkat untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik pada Materi Pokok Laju Reaksi","authors":"Maghfira Arifah, Jusniar Jusniar, M. Anwar","doi":"10.26858/cer.v6i1.39494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This development research aims to produce a valid, consistent, and practical three-tier diagnostic test instrument to identify students' misconceptions on the subject matter of reaction rate. The instrument development referred to the Treagust model (1988) which was adapted by Jusniar et. al (2020) which consisted of the misconception proposition analysis stage, the test prototype development stage, and the test instrument quality test stage. The misconception proposition analysis stage was conducted by reviewing the literature to analyze the main concepts and misconceptions in reaction rate subject, while the prototype test development stage was conducted by compiling a three-tier diagnostic test instrument which was adapted to the misconception proposition analysis and the 2013 Curriculum. The test instrument quality test stage was conducted to examine the feasibility of instrument. The instrument used for the validity test was the instrument validation sheet given to two validators for the content validity test, followed by an inter-rater test. The empirical validity test instrument and the consistency test were three-tier diagnostic tests that were tested on students of grade XII MIA 1 in a limited trial. The practicality test employed teachers’ response questionnaires and students’ response questionnaires. The teacher’s response questionnaire were given to two chemistry teachers, while the students’ response questionnaires were given to 30 students of grade XII MIA 1 in a limited trial and again given to 111 students of grade XI MIA in a field trial. The results of the content validity test obtains an average value of 3.29 which is in valid category with an R value of 95% in the inter-rater test and the results of the empirical validity test obtain an average value of 0.45 at tier 1 and 0.43 at tier 2 with valid category. The results of the consistency or reliability test obtains Cronbach's Alpha coefficient of 0.87 at tier 1 and 0.86 at tier 2, which is in high reliability category. The results of the practicality test using the teachers’ response questionnaire obtains 95.83%, the students’ response questionnaire in limited trial is 89.17%, and the students’ response questionnaire in field trial is 88.63%. The results obtained in the three practicality tests are in very practical category. The results of testing the three-tier diagnostic test instrument on the reaction rate subject obtain 69.55% of students in understanding category, 27.50% of students is in in less understanding category, and 2.95% of students is in misconception category.","PeriodicalId":270408,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry Education Review (CER)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry Education Review (CER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26858/cer.v6i1.39494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This development research aims to produce a valid, consistent, and practical three-tier diagnostic test instrument to identify students' misconceptions on the subject matter of reaction rate. The instrument development referred to the Treagust model (1988) which was adapted by Jusniar et. al (2020) which consisted of the misconception proposition analysis stage, the test prototype development stage, and the test instrument quality test stage. The misconception proposition analysis stage was conducted by reviewing the literature to analyze the main concepts and misconceptions in reaction rate subject, while the prototype test development stage was conducted by compiling a three-tier diagnostic test instrument which was adapted to the misconception proposition analysis and the 2013 Curriculum. The test instrument quality test stage was conducted to examine the feasibility of instrument. The instrument used for the validity test was the instrument validation sheet given to two validators for the content validity test, followed by an inter-rater test. The empirical validity test instrument and the consistency test were three-tier diagnostic tests that were tested on students of grade XII MIA 1 in a limited trial. The practicality test employed teachers’ response questionnaires and students’ response questionnaires. The teacher’s response questionnaire were given to two chemistry teachers, while the students’ response questionnaires were given to 30 students of grade XII MIA 1 in a limited trial and again given to 111 students of grade XI MIA in a field trial. The results of the content validity test obtains an average value of 3.29 which is in valid category with an R value of 95% in the inter-rater test and the results of the empirical validity test obtain an average value of 0.45 at tier 1 and 0.43 at tier 2 with valid category. The results of the consistency or reliability test obtains Cronbach's Alpha coefficient of 0.87 at tier 1 and 0.86 at tier 2, which is in high reliability category. The results of the practicality test using the teachers’ response questionnaire obtains 95.83%, the students’ response questionnaire in limited trial is 89.17%, and the students’ response questionnaire in field trial is 88.63%. The results obtained in the three practicality tests are in very practical category. The results of testing the three-tier diagnostic test instrument on the reaction rate subject obtain 69.55% of students in understanding category, 27.50% of students is in in less understanding category, and 2.95% of students is in misconception category.
采用三级诊断测试的仪器,以确定参与者对反应速率的基本材料的不受用性
本开发研究的目的是产生一个有效的、一致的、实用的三层诊断测试工具,以识别学生对反应率主题的误解。仪器开发指的是由Jusniar等人(2020)采用的Treagust模型(1988),该模型由误解命题分析阶段、测试原型开发阶段和测试仪器质量测试阶段组成。误解命题分析阶段是通过查阅文献,分析反应率科目的主要概念和误解,原型测试开发阶段是通过编写与误解命题分析和2013年课程相适应的三层诊断测试工具。为检验仪器的可行性,进行了仪器质量测试阶段。效度测试使用的工具是给两个内容效度测试的验证者的工具验证表,然后是一个内部测试。实证效度检验工具和一致性检验为三层诊断检验,在有限的试验中对初中12年级的学生进行了测试。实用性测试采用教师回答问卷和学生回答问卷。教师回答问卷发给2名化学教师,学生回答问卷发给30名初中12年级学生(有限试验),学生回答问卷发给111名初中11年级学生(现场试验)。内容效度检验结果的平均值为3.29,在效类间检验中R值为95%;经验效度检验结果的平均值为0.45,在效类间检验中为0.43。一致性或信度检验的结果得到第一层的Cronbach’s Alpha系数为0.87,第二层为0.86,属于高信度范畴。使用教师反应问卷进行实用性测试的结果为95.83%,有限试用学生反应问卷为89.17%,现场试用学生反应问卷为88.63%。三次实用性测试的结果都属于非常实用的范畴。三层诊断测试仪在反应率科目上的测试结果显示,69.55%的学生处于理解类别,27.50%的学生处于不太理解类别,2.95%的学生处于误解类别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信