Managing the paradox between equality and diversity in healthcare: Unwarranted vs warranted variations

S. Bojakowski
{"title":"Managing the paradox between equality and diversity in healthcare: Unwarranted vs warranted variations","authors":"S. Bojakowski","doi":"10.1179/175330310X12736578177562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Unwarranted variations in healthcare services are variations that cannot be explained by public health needs or medical needs. The NHS has introduced several policy initiatives aimed at reducing unwarranted variations, but there are barriers to their effectiveness. In recent years, efforts to address unwarranted variations in England and Wales have led to the Department of Health setting standards via agencies such as the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, with implementation and service development left to local health services. The implementation of centrally set standards has brought about greater transparency in the variations in healthcare provision across the UK. The key task for policymakers, managers and clinicians is to determine which of these variations are justifiable — or warranted — and which are unwarranted. This paper examines the extent of unwarranted variations as well as their implications for patient care and public confidence in the UK health system. It suggests that some local variation is warranted, provided minimum care standards are maintained.","PeriodicalId":354315,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management & Marketing in Healthcare","volume":"225 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management & Marketing in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/175330310X12736578177562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Abstract Unwarranted variations in healthcare services are variations that cannot be explained by public health needs or medical needs. The NHS has introduced several policy initiatives aimed at reducing unwarranted variations, but there are barriers to their effectiveness. In recent years, efforts to address unwarranted variations in England and Wales have led to the Department of Health setting standards via agencies such as the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, with implementation and service development left to local health services. The implementation of centrally set standards has brought about greater transparency in the variations in healthcare provision across the UK. The key task for policymakers, managers and clinicians is to determine which of these variations are justifiable — or warranted — and which are unwarranted. This paper examines the extent of unwarranted variations as well as their implications for patient care and public confidence in the UK health system. It suggests that some local variation is warranted, provided minimum care standards are maintained.
管理医疗保健中平等与多样性之间的悖论:无根据与有根据的差异
医疗服务的无端变化是指不能用公共卫生需求或医疗需求来解释的变化。国民保健服务已经推出了一些旨在减少不必要变化的政策举措,但它们的有效性存在障碍。近年来,为了解决英格兰和威尔士不合理的差异,卫生部通过国家健康和临床卓越研究所等机构制定了标准,而执行和服务发展则留给地方卫生服务机构。中央制定的标准的实施使英国各地医疗保健服务的变化更加透明。决策者、管理人员和临床医生的关键任务是确定这些变化中哪些是合理的——或有根据的——哪些是没有根据的。本文考察了无根据的变化的程度,以及他们对英国卫生系统的病人护理和公众信心的影响。它表明,只要维持最低的护理标准,一些地方的变化是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信