Carbon Sequestration: The Ignored Promise of the Non-Utilization of Carbon Route

S. Gupta
{"title":"Carbon Sequestration: The Ignored Promise of the Non-Utilization of Carbon Route","authors":"S. Gupta","doi":"10.2118/212815-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Despite the mature nature of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology and its combination with various ways of carbon utilization (CCUS), the extent of its global application has been less than 0.1% in addressing the emissions challenge. The reason is the high cost of CCS compared to the prevailing price on carbon in most jurisdictions. The objective of this paper is to present potentially low-cost alternatives to CCS/CCUS.\n Petroleum is the most suitable fuel for the transport needs of the society due to its unparalleled energy density and affordability. The goal of limiting atmospheric CO2 can be met equivalently either by addressing emissions from petroleum (e.g., with CCS) at a cost, or with use of low carbon fuels such as renewables. So far, alternatives to petroleum, despite some advances, have faced an even higher cost hurdle. Therefore petroleum-based fuels with carbon mitigation, deserve a fresh look. CCS has a cost range of $70 - 150/t CO2. While at this cost, oil may still have an advantage over some alternatives, it is an edge that can be further enhanced with new developing technologies such as Lower-oxidation (L-ox) among others (SPE-196109). In L-Ox, energy is derived from carbonaceous fuels in a manner that does not produce a gaseous waste product - CO2.\n The current work first starts with highlighting the limitations of various now-familiar options such as hydrogen, direct air capture, or renewables etc., then it discusses the technical feasibility of electro-thermo-chemical (ETC) routes that show promise and require relatively limited further development of technology, utilizing insights and support from recent advances in unrelated fields. ETC-based approaches can be used both for deriving energy without CO2 production (as in L-Ox), as well as for chemical reduction of the CO2 (produced in the combustion process of energy generation) into ‘useless’ liquids or solids. This latter approach – ‘non-utilization and sequestration’, quite opposite to CCUS, along with L-Ox presents a more economically sustainable option for carbon abatement. This paper lends substance to support the expected feasibility of each.\n Aside from providing a critique of various alternatives, this work offers new insights into developing novel electro-thermo-chemical methods for a low-cost carbon abatement. The significance of this is in helping sustain and preserve global living standards, through affordable, energy-dense, and carbon-neutralized petroleum.","PeriodicalId":437231,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Wed, March 15, 2023","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Wed, March 15, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/212815-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the mature nature of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology and its combination with various ways of carbon utilization (CCUS), the extent of its global application has been less than 0.1% in addressing the emissions challenge. The reason is the high cost of CCS compared to the prevailing price on carbon in most jurisdictions. The objective of this paper is to present potentially low-cost alternatives to CCS/CCUS. Petroleum is the most suitable fuel for the transport needs of the society due to its unparalleled energy density and affordability. The goal of limiting atmospheric CO2 can be met equivalently either by addressing emissions from petroleum (e.g., with CCS) at a cost, or with use of low carbon fuels such as renewables. So far, alternatives to petroleum, despite some advances, have faced an even higher cost hurdle. Therefore petroleum-based fuels with carbon mitigation, deserve a fresh look. CCS has a cost range of $70 - 150/t CO2. While at this cost, oil may still have an advantage over some alternatives, it is an edge that can be further enhanced with new developing technologies such as Lower-oxidation (L-ox) among others (SPE-196109). In L-Ox, energy is derived from carbonaceous fuels in a manner that does not produce a gaseous waste product - CO2. The current work first starts with highlighting the limitations of various now-familiar options such as hydrogen, direct air capture, or renewables etc., then it discusses the technical feasibility of electro-thermo-chemical (ETC) routes that show promise and require relatively limited further development of technology, utilizing insights and support from recent advances in unrelated fields. ETC-based approaches can be used both for deriving energy without CO2 production (as in L-Ox), as well as for chemical reduction of the CO2 (produced in the combustion process of energy generation) into ‘useless’ liquids or solids. This latter approach – ‘non-utilization and sequestration’, quite opposite to CCUS, along with L-Ox presents a more economically sustainable option for carbon abatement. This paper lends substance to support the expected feasibility of each. Aside from providing a critique of various alternatives, this work offers new insights into developing novel electro-thermo-chemical methods for a low-cost carbon abatement. The significance of this is in helping sustain and preserve global living standards, through affordable, energy-dense, and carbon-neutralized petroleum.
碳固存:不利用碳途径的被忽视的承诺
尽管碳捕集与封存(CCS)技术及其与各种碳利用方式(CCUS)的结合具有成熟的性质,但在应对排放挑战方面,其全球应用程度还不到0.1%。原因是与大多数司法管辖区的现行碳价格相比,CCS的成本较高。本文的目的是提出CCS/CCUS的潜在低成本替代品。由于其无与伦比的能量密度和可负担性,石油是最适合社会运输需求的燃料。限制大气中二氧化碳排放的目标既可以通过有成本地解决石油排放(如CCS),也可以通过使用可再生能源等低碳燃料来实现。到目前为止,尽管取得了一些进展,但石油的替代品面临着更高的成本障碍。因此,减少碳排放的石油基燃料值得重新审视。CCS的成本范围为每吨二氧化碳70 - 150美元。虽然在这个成本下,石油可能仍然比其他一些替代品有优势,但随着新技术的发展,这种优势可以进一步增强,比如低氧化(L-ox)技术(SPE-196109)。在L-Ox中,能源以一种不产生气态废物——二氧化碳的方式从含碳燃料中获得。目前的工作首先强调了各种现在熟悉的选择的局限性,如氢气、直接空气捕获或可再生能源等,然后讨论了电热化学(etc)路线的技术可行性,这些路线显示出希望,并且需要相对有限的进一步技术发展,利用来自不相关领域最新进展的见解和支持。基于etc的方法既可以用于不产生二氧化碳的能源(如L-Ox),也可以用于化学还原二氧化碳(在能源产生的燃烧过程中产生)为“无用的”液体或固体。后一种方法——“不利用和封存”,与CCUS完全相反,与L-Ox一起,为碳减排提供了一种更经济可持续的选择。本文为支持每一个预期的可行性提供了实质内容。除了对各种替代方案进行批判之外,这项工作还为开发新型低成本碳减排的电热化学方法提供了新的见解。其意义在于,通过价格合理、能源密集、碳中和的石油,帮助维持和维护全球生活水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信