Modelling prokaryote gene content

M. Spencer, E. Susko, A. Roger
{"title":"Modelling prokaryote gene content","authors":"M. Spencer, E. Susko, A. Roger","doi":"10.1177/117693430600200029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The patchy distribution of genes across the prokaryotes may be caused by multiple gene losses or lateral transfer. Probabilistic models of gene gain and loss are needed to distinguish between these possibilities. Existing models allow only single genes to be gained and lost, despite the empirical evidence for multi-gene events. We compare birth-death models (currently the only widely-used models, in which only one gene can be gained or lost at a time) to blocks models (allowing gain and loss of multiple genes within a family). We analyze two pairs of genomes: two E. coli strains, and the distantly-related Archaeoglobus fulgidus (archaea) and Bacillus subtilis (gram positive bacteria). Blocks models describe the data much better than birth-death models. Our models suggest that lateral transfers of multiple genes from the same family are rare (although transfers of single genes are probably common). For both pairs, the estimated median time that a gene will remain in the genome is not much greater than the time separating the common ancestors of the archaea and bacteria. Deep phylogenetic reconstruction from sequence data will therefore depend on choosing genes likely to remain in the genome for a long time. Phylogenies based on the blocks model are more biologically plausible than phylogenies based on the birth-death model.","PeriodicalId":136690,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/117693430600200029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

The patchy distribution of genes across the prokaryotes may be caused by multiple gene losses or lateral transfer. Probabilistic models of gene gain and loss are needed to distinguish between these possibilities. Existing models allow only single genes to be gained and lost, despite the empirical evidence for multi-gene events. We compare birth-death models (currently the only widely-used models, in which only one gene can be gained or lost at a time) to blocks models (allowing gain and loss of multiple genes within a family). We analyze two pairs of genomes: two E. coli strains, and the distantly-related Archaeoglobus fulgidus (archaea) and Bacillus subtilis (gram positive bacteria). Blocks models describe the data much better than birth-death models. Our models suggest that lateral transfers of multiple genes from the same family are rare (although transfers of single genes are probably common). For both pairs, the estimated median time that a gene will remain in the genome is not much greater than the time separating the common ancestors of the archaea and bacteria. Deep phylogenetic reconstruction from sequence data will therefore depend on choosing genes likely to remain in the genome for a long time. Phylogenies based on the blocks model are more biologically plausible than phylogenies based on the birth-death model.
模拟原核生物基因含量
基因在原核生物中的斑驳分布可能是由多个基因丢失或横向转移引起的。需要基因获得和损失的概率模型来区分这些可能性。尽管有多基因事件的经验证据,但现有的模型只允许获得和丢失单个基因。我们比较了出生-死亡模型(目前唯一广泛使用的模型,其中一次只能获得或丢失一个基因)和块模型(允许在一个家庭中获得或丢失多个基因)。我们分析了两对基因组:两种大肠杆菌菌株,以及远亲的富氏古球菌(archaeabus fulgidus)和枯草芽孢杆菌(Bacillus subtilis)。块模型比出生-死亡模型更能描述数据。我们的模型表明,来自同一家族的多个基因的横向转移是罕见的(尽管单个基因的转移可能很常见)。对于这两对,一个基因在基因组中保留的估计中值时间并不比古细菌和细菌的共同祖先分离的时间大多少。因此,从序列数据中进行深度系统发育重建将取决于选择可能在基因组中长期保留的基因。基于块模型的系统发生比基于出生-死亡模型的系统发生在生物学上更可信。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信