Upslope Flows in Atmosphere and Water Tank, Part II: Fluid-Dynamical Smoothness as a Possible Cause for Velocity Similarity Violation

C. Reuten, D. Steyn, S. Allen
{"title":"Upslope Flows in Atmosphere and Water Tank, Part II: Fluid-Dynamical Smoothness as a Possible Cause for Velocity Similarity Violation","authors":"C. Reuten, D. Steyn, S. Allen","doi":"10.2174/1874282301004010188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Water-tank models of meso-scale atmospheric processes often show good qualitative agreement of bulk quantities and flow characteristics and good quantitative agreement of turbulence quantities with field observations. However, it was demonstrated in the first part of this two-part communication that the similarity of velocities of thermally driven upslope flows in atmosphere and water tank is violated. It is shown in this part that the velocities of thermally driven upslope flows in the atmosphere and in a water-tank model have statistically different dependences on proposed governing parameters. Of four substantially different hypotheses of upslope velocities, three agree with field observations because of large uncertainties and sparse data, but all hypotheses disagree with tank observations. One hypothesis that includes the influence of the total slope height agrees with field and tank observations when assuming fluid-dynamically rough atmospheric flows and fluid-dynamically smooth tank flows. The non-dimensional upslope flow velocities corresponding to rough and smooth flows depend differently on the governing parameters. Therefore, non-dimensional upslope flow velocities are different for atmosphere and water tank. Furthermore, as this hypothesis includes a dependence of the upslope flow velocity on the total height of the slope it implies that upslope flow systems are non-local phenomena. Because fluid-dynamical roughness is technically difficult to achieve in water-tank models, velocity similarity violations can also be expected in water-tank models of other thermally driven meso-scale flows and our technique of explicitly including roughness length dependence may have wider applications.","PeriodicalId":122982,"journal":{"name":"The Open Atmospheric Science Journal","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Atmospheric Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874282301004010188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Water-tank models of meso-scale atmospheric processes often show good qualitative agreement of bulk quantities and flow characteristics and good quantitative agreement of turbulence quantities with field observations. However, it was demonstrated in the first part of this two-part communication that the similarity of velocities of thermally driven upslope flows in atmosphere and water tank is violated. It is shown in this part that the velocities of thermally driven upslope flows in the atmosphere and in a water-tank model have statistically different dependences on proposed governing parameters. Of four substantially different hypotheses of upslope velocities, three agree with field observations because of large uncertainties and sparse data, but all hypotheses disagree with tank observations. One hypothesis that includes the influence of the total slope height agrees with field and tank observations when assuming fluid-dynamically rough atmospheric flows and fluid-dynamically smooth tank flows. The non-dimensional upslope flow velocities corresponding to rough and smooth flows depend differently on the governing parameters. Therefore, non-dimensional upslope flow velocities are different for atmosphere and water tank. Furthermore, as this hypothesis includes a dependence of the upslope flow velocity on the total height of the slope it implies that upslope flow systems are non-local phenomena. Because fluid-dynamical roughness is technically difficult to achieve in water-tank models, velocity similarity violations can also be expected in water-tank models of other thermally driven meso-scale flows and our technique of explicitly including roughness length dependence may have wider applications.
大气和水箱中的上坡流动,第二部分:流体动力学平滑作为速度相似破坏的可能原因
中尺度大气过程的水箱模式通常在体积和流动特征上表现出良好的定性一致性,在湍流量上也与现场观测结果表现出良好的定量一致性。然而,在这两部分的交流中,第一部分证明了大气和水箱中热驱动的上坡流速度的相似性是被打破的。这一部分表明,在大气和水箱模型中,热驱动的上坡流的速度对所提出的控制参数有统计上的不同依赖。在四种不同的上坡速度假设中,有三种与现场观测结果一致,因为不确定性大,数据稀疏,但所有假设都与油罐观测结果不一致。在假定流体动力学上粗糙的大气流动和流体动力学上平滑的储罐流动时,一种包括总坡高影响的假设与现场和储罐观测结果一致。粗流和光滑流对应的无因次上坡流速对控制参数的依赖程度不同。因此,大气和水箱的无因次上坡流速是不同的。此外,由于这一假设包含了上坡流动速度与坡面总高度的关系,这意味着上坡流动系统是非局部现象。由于流体动力学粗糙度在技术上难以在水箱模型中实现,因此在其他热驱动中尺度流动的水箱模型中也可以预期速度相似违反,因此我们明确包括粗糙度长度依赖的技术可能具有更广泛的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信