Automatic Checking of Quality Best Practices in Software Development Documents

A. Dautovic, Reinhold Plösch, Matthias Saft
{"title":"Automatic Checking of Quality Best Practices in Software Development Documents","authors":"A. Dautovic, Reinhold Plösch, Matthias Saft","doi":"10.1109/QSIC.2011.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quality assurance tasks of software products typically take place throughout the entire software development life-cycle. Frequently, paper-based inspections methods are used to review software development documents (e.g. requirements specifications, design documents, test plans). Nevertheless, even though the quality of these documents has a major impact on the quality of the developed software product, they are often not as rigorously reviewed as source code. This paper presents a tool-based approach that facilitates the software inspection process in order to determine defects of generally accepted documentation best practices in software development documents. Moreover, we present results of a conducted empirical study and show how this tool-based approach helps to facilitate inspection tasks and to support gathering information on the quality of the inspected documents.","PeriodicalId":309774,"journal":{"name":"2011 11th International Conference on Quality Software","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 11th International Conference on Quality Software","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QSIC.2011.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Quality assurance tasks of software products typically take place throughout the entire software development life-cycle. Frequently, paper-based inspections methods are used to review software development documents (e.g. requirements specifications, design documents, test plans). Nevertheless, even though the quality of these documents has a major impact on the quality of the developed software product, they are often not as rigorously reviewed as source code. This paper presents a tool-based approach that facilitates the software inspection process in order to determine defects of generally accepted documentation best practices in software development documents. Moreover, we present results of a conducted empirical study and show how this tool-based approach helps to facilitate inspection tasks and to support gathering information on the quality of the inspected documents.
软件开发文档中质量最佳实践的自动检查
软件产品的质量保证任务通常贯穿于整个软件开发生命周期。通常,基于纸张的检查方法用于审查软件开发文档(例如,需求规范、设计文档、测试计划)。然而,尽管这些文档的质量对开发的软件产品的质量有很大的影响,但是它们通常不像源代码那样被严格审查。本文提出了一种基于工具的方法,该方法促进了软件检查过程,以便确定软件开发文档中普遍接受的文档最佳实践的缺陷。此外,我们提出了一项经验性研究的结果,并展示了这种基于工具的方法如何有助于促进检查任务,并支持收集有关被检查文件质量的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信