Comparison of machine learning methods for multiphase flowrate prediction

Zhenyu Jiang, Haokun Wang, Yunjie Yang, Yi Li
{"title":"Comparison of machine learning methods for multiphase flowrate prediction","authors":"Zhenyu Jiang, Haokun Wang, Yunjie Yang, Yi Li","doi":"10.1109/IST48021.2019.9010450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, three prevailing machine learning methods, i.e. Deep Neural Network (DNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) models were investigated and compared to estimate the flowrate of oil/gas/water three-phase flow. The time-series differential pressure signals collected from Venturi tube together with pressure and temperature measurements were utilized as input. Multiphase flow experiments were conducted on a laboratory-scale multiphase flow facility. Experimental results suggest that DNN and SVM based methods were able to achieve accurate and reliable estimation of multiphase flowrate, whilst GBDT failed to fit the estimation process well. Another finding emerged from this study is that volumetric gas phase flowrate can also be accurately predicted by implementing SVM model.","PeriodicalId":117219,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IST48021.2019.9010450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper, three prevailing machine learning methods, i.e. Deep Neural Network (DNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) models were investigated and compared to estimate the flowrate of oil/gas/water three-phase flow. The time-series differential pressure signals collected from Venturi tube together with pressure and temperature measurements were utilized as input. Multiphase flow experiments were conducted on a laboratory-scale multiphase flow facility. Experimental results suggest that DNN and SVM based methods were able to achieve accurate and reliable estimation of multiphase flowrate, whilst GBDT failed to fit the estimation process well. Another finding emerged from this study is that volumetric gas phase flowrate can also be accurately predicted by implementing SVM model.
多相流量预测的机器学习方法比较
本文对深度神经网络(Deep Neural Network, DNN)、支持向量机(Support Vector machine, SVM)和梯度增强决策树(Gradient Boosting Decision Tree, GBDT)三种常用的机器学习方法进行了研究和比较,用于油/气/水三相流的流量估计。利用文丘里管采集的时间序列压差信号以及压力和温度测量作为输入。在实验室规模的多相流装置上进行了多相流实验。实验结果表明,基于DNN和SVM的方法能够准确、可靠地估计多相流量,而GBDT不能很好地拟合多相流量的估计过程。本研究的另一个发现是,采用SVM模型也可以准确地预测体积气相流量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信