{"title":"Global Credit Shocks and Real Economies","authors":"H. Herwartz, Christian Ochsner, H. Rohloff","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3849452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A rich literature has established the importance of global funding conditions (‘global liquidity’) for the international financial system (e.g. Borio, McCauley, and McGuire 2011). In particular, Eickmeier, Gambacorta, and Hofmann (2014) made an important contribution by presenting a structural decomposition of global liquidity. However, the interplay of structural global liquidity surprises with domestic business cycles has yet received only minor attention. With given quantifications of global credit demand and supply shocks at hand, we estimate the marginal effects of identified components of global liquidity on 43 real economies. Going beyond the aggregate view at global liquidity provided in Eickmeier et al. (2014), we put a particular focus on the sectoral origins (i.e. public vs. private) of credit demand/supply components, and rely on factoraugmented vector-autoregressions to trace disaggregated credit shocks through the real economy (output, inflation and unemployment). Specifically, business credit supply and government credit demand boost the business cycle, whereas household credit supply is found to deteriorate output. We find substantial heterogeneity with respect to prevalence and amplitude of global sectoral credit shocks on real aggregates within the time and cross-sectional (country) dimension.","PeriodicalId":155479,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Modeling: Macroeconomics eJournal","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Modeling: Macroeconomics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3849452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A rich literature has established the importance of global funding conditions (‘global liquidity’) for the international financial system (e.g. Borio, McCauley, and McGuire 2011). In particular, Eickmeier, Gambacorta, and Hofmann (2014) made an important contribution by presenting a structural decomposition of global liquidity. However, the interplay of structural global liquidity surprises with domestic business cycles has yet received only minor attention. With given quantifications of global credit demand and supply shocks at hand, we estimate the marginal effects of identified components of global liquidity on 43 real economies. Going beyond the aggregate view at global liquidity provided in Eickmeier et al. (2014), we put a particular focus on the sectoral origins (i.e. public vs. private) of credit demand/supply components, and rely on factoraugmented vector-autoregressions to trace disaggregated credit shocks through the real economy (output, inflation and unemployment). Specifically, business credit supply and government credit demand boost the business cycle, whereas household credit supply is found to deteriorate output. We find substantial heterogeneity with respect to prevalence and amplitude of global sectoral credit shocks on real aggregates within the time and cross-sectional (country) dimension.
丰富的文献已经确立了全球融资条件(“全球流动性”)对国际金融体系的重要性(例如Borio, McCauley, and McGuire, 2011)。特别是,Eickmeier、Gambacorta和Hofmann(2014)提出了全球流动性的结构性分解,做出了重要贡献。然而,结构性全球流动性意外与国内商业周期的相互作用迄今只受到很少的关注。在给定全球信贷需求和供给冲击量化的基础上,我们估计了43个实体经济体中已确定的全球流动性组成部分的边际效应。在Eickmeier等人(2014)提供的全球流动性总体观点之外,我们特别关注信贷需求/供应组成部分的部门起源(即公共与私人),并依靠因素增强向量自回归来追踪实体经济(产出、通胀和失业)中的分类信贷冲击。具体而言,企业信贷供给和政府信贷需求促进了经济周期,而家庭信贷供给则恶化了产出。我们发现,在时间和横截面(国家)维度上,全球部门信贷冲击的普遍程度和幅度在实际总量上存在很大的异质性。