Planning for Precarity? Experiencing the Carceral Continuum of Imprisonment and Reentry

Gillian Balfour, Kelly Hannah-Moffat, S. Turnbull
{"title":"Planning for Precarity? Experiencing the Carceral Continuum of Imprisonment and Reentry","authors":"Gillian Balfour, Kelly Hannah-Moffat, S. Turnbull","doi":"10.1108/S1059-433720180000077002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nDrawing on qualitative interviews with formerly imprisoned people in Canada, we show that most prisoners experience reentry into communities with little to no prerelease planning, and must rely upon their own resourcefulness to navigate fragmented social services and often informal supports. In this respect, our research findings contrast with much US punishment and society scholarship that highlights a complex shadow carceral state that extends the reach of incarceration into communities. Our participants expressed a critical analysis of the failure of the prison to address the needs of prisoners for release planning and supports in the community. Our findings concur with other empirical studies that demonstrate the enduring effects of the continuum of carceral violence witnessed and experienced by prisoners after release. Thus, reentry must be understood in relation to the conditions of confinement and the experience of incarceration itself. We conclude that punishment and society scholarship needs to attend to a nuanced understanding of prisoner reentry and connect reentry studies to a wider critique of the prison industrial complex, offering more empirical evidence of the failure of prisons.","PeriodicalId":143606,"journal":{"name":"After Imprisonment","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"After Imprisonment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1059-433720180000077002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Abstract Drawing on qualitative interviews with formerly imprisoned people in Canada, we show that most prisoners experience reentry into communities with little to no prerelease planning, and must rely upon their own resourcefulness to navigate fragmented social services and often informal supports. In this respect, our research findings contrast with much US punishment and society scholarship that highlights a complex shadow carceral state that extends the reach of incarceration into communities. Our participants expressed a critical analysis of the failure of the prison to address the needs of prisoners for release planning and supports in the community. Our findings concur with other empirical studies that demonstrate the enduring effects of the continuum of carceral violence witnessed and experienced by prisoners after release. Thus, reentry must be understood in relation to the conditions of confinement and the experience of incarceration itself. We conclude that punishment and society scholarship needs to attend to a nuanced understanding of prisoner reentry and connect reentry studies to a wider critique of the prison industrial complex, offering more empirical evidence of the failure of prisons.
为不稳定做计划?经历了连续不断的监禁和再入监狱
通过对加拿大前囚犯的定性访谈,我们发现,大多数囚犯在重新进入社区时几乎没有释放前的计划,他们必须依靠自己的智慧来应对零散的社会服务和非正式的支持。在这方面,我们的研究结果与许多美国惩罚和社会研究形成对比,后者强调了一个复杂的影子监狱状态,将监禁的范围扩展到社区。我们的与会者对监狱未能满足囚犯在社区释放规划和支持方面的需求进行了批判性分析。我们的发现与其他实证研究相一致,这些研究表明,囚犯在获释后目睹和经历的持续的监狱暴力会产生持久的影响。因此,必须根据监禁的条件和监禁本身的经历来理解重返社会。我们的结论是,惩罚和社会研究需要对囚犯重返社会进行细致入微的理解,并将重返社会研究与对监狱工业综合体的更广泛批评联系起来,为监狱的失败提供更多的经验证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信