Shame and Normative Expectations about Reading in Perception of Scientific Workers

E. Zhesko, I. Chudova
{"title":"Shame and Normative Expectations about Reading in Perception of Scientific Workers","authors":"E. Zhesko, I. Chudova","doi":"10.25205/2542-0429-2021-21-4-175-186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article attempts to consider emotional perception and normative orientation in reading with an emphasis on such emotions as shame. Reading is a significant part of the daily lives of researchers, and obviously there are a number of social norms around and about reading. In the course of the research, an assumption was made that the normative expectations relevant to the reader are able to create a ground for experiencing shame. Phenomenological analysis of interviews and focus group materials with researchers allowed us to identify reasons for shame about professional and leisure reading in relation to regulatory constraints, some explanations of this experience, as well as related features of motivation to read. The experience of shame in relation to reading comes from the perception of the researcher himself in the modification of reading and the corresponding normative expectations – so, the manifestation of shame was recorded in discussions about both work and leisure reading. It turned out that reading both scientific and leisure literature is perceived by researchers as their status duty, in this regard, its \"inadequacy\" becomes a key reason for experiencing shame.","PeriodicalId":156080,"journal":{"name":"World of Economics and Management","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World of Economics and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2021-21-4-175-186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article attempts to consider emotional perception and normative orientation in reading with an emphasis on such emotions as shame. Reading is a significant part of the daily lives of researchers, and obviously there are a number of social norms around and about reading. In the course of the research, an assumption was made that the normative expectations relevant to the reader are able to create a ground for experiencing shame. Phenomenological analysis of interviews and focus group materials with researchers allowed us to identify reasons for shame about professional and leisure reading in relation to regulatory constraints, some explanations of this experience, as well as related features of motivation to read. The experience of shame in relation to reading comes from the perception of the researcher himself in the modification of reading and the corresponding normative expectations – so, the manifestation of shame was recorded in discussions about both work and leisure reading. It turned out that reading both scientific and leisure literature is perceived by researchers as their status duty, in this regard, its "inadequacy" becomes a key reason for experiencing shame.
科学工作者认知中的阅读羞耻感与规范性期望
本文试图探讨阅读中的情感感知和规范取向,重点关注羞耻等情感。阅读是研究人员日常生活的重要组成部分,显然有许多关于阅读的社会规范。在研究过程中,假设与读者相关的规范性期望能够创造一个体验羞耻的基础。对研究人员的访谈和焦点小组材料进行现象学分析,使我们能够确定与监管约束有关的专业阅读和休闲阅读羞耻的原因,对这种经历的一些解释,以及阅读动机的相关特征。与阅读相关的羞耻感体验来自研究者自身对阅读修改的感知以及相应的规范性期望——因此,羞耻感的表现既记录在工作阅读的讨论中,也记录在休闲阅读的讨论中。事实证明,阅读科学文献和休闲文献都被研究者视为他们的身份义务,在这方面,其“不足”成为体验羞耻的关键原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信