PATTERN AND PREDICTORS OF SUBSTANCE USE AMONG IN-SCHOOL ADOLESCENTS: A COMPARISON OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN GOMBE LGA, GOMBE STATE, NIGERIA.

A. Mohammed, M. Chingle, E. Envuladu, Joshua A. Difa, E. Okoh, I. Osagie, Abdulrazaak Aliu
{"title":"PATTERN AND PREDICTORS OF SUBSTANCE USE AMONG IN-SCHOOL ADOLESCENTS: A COMPARISON OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN GOMBE LGA, GOMBE STATE, NIGERIA.","authors":"A. Mohammed, M. Chingle, E. Envuladu, Joshua A. Difa, E. Okoh, I. Osagie, Abdulrazaak Aliu","doi":"10.51658/abms.202121.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Substance use is a Public Health problem with significant negative consequences on the physical, psychological and mental health of individuals with worse effects among adolescents. The objective of this study was to determine and compare the pattern and predictors of substance use among in-school adolescents in Public and Private secondary schools in Gombe LGA, Gombe State. Methods: It was a comparative cross-sectional study. Multistage sampling technique was used to select participants from both comparison groups. Data was collected using a pretested self-administered questionnaire. All data generated were collated and analysed using the IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23. Results: The proportion of students engaged in substance use were 17.9% and 18.9% in private and public secondary schools respectively, this was not statistically significantly different (P-value 0.830). There was a statistically significant difference in the level of health risk associated with substance use among respondent in public and private schools (P value 0.008). Furthermore, respondents in public schools who almost never participated in religious activities and those who occasionally participated in religious activities had 4.2 and 3.5 times more odds respectively of using substances compared to those who almost always participated in religious activities p value 0.007 (CI 1.497-12.008) and p value 0.008 (CI 1.398-9.183) respectively. In both schools, those who had friends that used substances were more likely to use them p value <0.001(OR 0.99; CI 0.039-0.232) for private and p value <0.001 (OR 0.108; CI 0.048-0.245) for public schools. Conclusion: This study has therefore implied that there is no difference in the proportion and pattern of substance use by adolescents in both private and public secondary schools, however, the level of health risk is more among those in private schools.","PeriodicalId":330738,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Basic and Medical Sciences","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Basic and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51658/abms.202121.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Substance use is a Public Health problem with significant negative consequences on the physical, psychological and mental health of individuals with worse effects among adolescents. The objective of this study was to determine and compare the pattern and predictors of substance use among in-school adolescents in Public and Private secondary schools in Gombe LGA, Gombe State. Methods: It was a comparative cross-sectional study. Multistage sampling technique was used to select participants from both comparison groups. Data was collected using a pretested self-administered questionnaire. All data generated were collated and analysed using the IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23. Results: The proportion of students engaged in substance use were 17.9% and 18.9% in private and public secondary schools respectively, this was not statistically significantly different (P-value 0.830). There was a statistically significant difference in the level of health risk associated with substance use among respondent in public and private schools (P value 0.008). Furthermore, respondents in public schools who almost never participated in religious activities and those who occasionally participated in religious activities had 4.2 and 3.5 times more odds respectively of using substances compared to those who almost always participated in religious activities p value 0.007 (CI 1.497-12.008) and p value 0.008 (CI 1.398-9.183) respectively. In both schools, those who had friends that used substances were more likely to use them p value <0.001(OR 0.99; CI 0.039-0.232) for private and p value <0.001 (OR 0.108; CI 0.048-0.245) for public schools. Conclusion: This study has therefore implied that there is no difference in the proportion and pattern of substance use by adolescents in both private and public secondary schools, however, the level of health risk is more among those in private schools.
在校青少年药物使用的模式和预测因素:尼日利亚贡贝州贡贝伊加公立和私立中学的比较。
背景:药物使用是一个公共卫生问题,对个人的身体、心理和精神健康产生重大负面影响,在青少年中影响更严重。本研究的目的是确定和比较贡贝州贡贝州公立和私立中学在校青少年药物使用的模式和预测因素。方法:采用比较横断面研究。采用多阶段抽样方法从两个对照组中选取参与者。数据收集使用预先测试的自我管理问卷。所有生成的数据都使用IBM社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)第23版进行整理和分析。结果:私立中学和公立中学学生物质使用比例分别为17.9%和18.9%,差异无统计学意义(p值0.830)。公立学校和私立学校被调查者与药物使用相关的健康风险水平差异有统计学意义(P值0.008)。此外,公立学校中几乎从不参加宗教活动和偶尔参加宗教活动的被调查者使用物质的几率分别是几乎总是参加宗教活动的被调查者的4.2倍和3.5倍,p值分别为0.007 (CI 1.497-12.008)和0.008 (CI 1.398-9.183)。在这两所学校,那些有朋友使用药物的人更有可能使用它们p值<0.001(OR 0.99;私人的CI为0.039-0.232),p值<0.001 (OR 0.108;CI为0.048-0.245)。结论:本研究表明,私立和公立中学的青少年物质使用比例和模式没有差异,但私立学校的青少年健康风险水平更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信