Robotic arm assisted surgery in orthopaedics: a Health Technology Assessment evaluation in Liguria Region

Alessandro Sparacino, M. Giacomini, Gabriella Paoli, L. Paleari, Gaetano Stefano Scillieri
{"title":"Robotic arm assisted surgery in orthopaedics: a Health Technology Assessment evaluation in Liguria Region","authors":"Alessandro Sparacino, M. Giacomini, Gabriella Paoli, L. Paleari, Gaetano Stefano Scillieri","doi":"10.1109/MELECON48756.2020.9140624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Robotic surgery is a mini-invasive technique that involves the execution of interventions with collaborative robots. Among them, the MAKO system is a high-tech robotic platform for prosthetic surgery in orthopaedics. Liguria faces the problem of the balance between demand and offer of arthroplasty due to the high presence of the elderly concerning its demographic configuration. The high passive mobility due to the interventions of orthopaedic prostheses and the presence on Ligurian soil (Local Health Unit 5, LHU5) of a robotic system for the prosthetic implant, suggest to perform an assessment of the assistant consequences, economic, social and ethical caused by the adoption of MAKO technology with an HTA approach.Methods: We conducted a comprehensive review of the scientific literature to find evidence on the benefit of MAKO robotic-arm assisted surgery for partial (UKA) or total (TKA) knee arthroplasty. Data on the number of admissions for UKA and TKA interventions and the hospital stay average in Liguria was extracted from the regional database.Results: The literature search identified 14 papers. Most of them were not considered with proper evidence because not being peer-reviews published in an indexed journal, studies conducted on cadavers, limited to the operative phase and lacking clinical outcomes, non-experimental studies, studies without comparators or with inadequate comparators. Thus, we selected 3 studies. Focusing on the LHU5 data from the regional database, we observed an annual increase of about 90% in hospitalizations and an average decrease of 3-day hospitalization days.Conclusions: The type of studies and the evidence available are rather thin and not consolidated either from clinical effectiveness or safety or cost-effectiveness. It is not possible today to estimate adequately how and how much these costs will be translated into practical clinical benefits and possible economic savings. Therefore, it is believed that the adoption of this technology should exclusively take place in the context of a research activity aimed at defining all the possible dimensions of the technology (safety-efficacy-cost/effectiveness).","PeriodicalId":268311,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE 20th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference ( MELECON)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE 20th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference ( MELECON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MELECON48756.2020.9140624","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Robotic surgery is a mini-invasive technique that involves the execution of interventions with collaborative robots. Among them, the MAKO system is a high-tech robotic platform for prosthetic surgery in orthopaedics. Liguria faces the problem of the balance between demand and offer of arthroplasty due to the high presence of the elderly concerning its demographic configuration. The high passive mobility due to the interventions of orthopaedic prostheses and the presence on Ligurian soil (Local Health Unit 5, LHU5) of a robotic system for the prosthetic implant, suggest to perform an assessment of the assistant consequences, economic, social and ethical caused by the adoption of MAKO technology with an HTA approach.Methods: We conducted a comprehensive review of the scientific literature to find evidence on the benefit of MAKO robotic-arm assisted surgery for partial (UKA) or total (TKA) knee arthroplasty. Data on the number of admissions for UKA and TKA interventions and the hospital stay average in Liguria was extracted from the regional database.Results: The literature search identified 14 papers. Most of them were not considered with proper evidence because not being peer-reviews published in an indexed journal, studies conducted on cadavers, limited to the operative phase and lacking clinical outcomes, non-experimental studies, studies without comparators or with inadequate comparators. Thus, we selected 3 studies. Focusing on the LHU5 data from the regional database, we observed an annual increase of about 90% in hospitalizations and an average decrease of 3-day hospitalization days.Conclusions: The type of studies and the evidence available are rather thin and not consolidated either from clinical effectiveness or safety or cost-effectiveness. It is not possible today to estimate adequately how and how much these costs will be translated into practical clinical benefits and possible economic savings. Therefore, it is believed that the adoption of this technology should exclusively take place in the context of a research activity aimed at defining all the possible dimensions of the technology (safety-efficacy-cost/effectiveness).
机械臂辅助骨科手术:利古里亚地区卫生技术评估评价
背景:机器人手术是一种微创技术,涉及使用协作机器人执行干预。其中,MAKO系统是骨科中用于假肢手术的高科技机器人平台。利古里亚面临着需求和提供关节置换术之间的平衡问题,由于其人口结构中老年人的高存在。由于矫形假体的干预和利古里亚土壤(当地卫生单位5,LHU5)机器人假体植入系统的高被动移动性,建议采用HTA方法对采用MAKO技术所产生的辅助后果、经济、社会和伦理进行评估。方法:我们对科学文献进行了全面的回顾,以寻找MAKO机械臂辅助手术在部分(UKA)或全部(TKA)膝关节置换术中获益的证据。从区域数据库中提取了利古里亚UKA和TKA干预措施的入院人数和平均住院时间的数据。结果:检索到文献14篇。大多数研究被认为没有适当的证据,因为没有在索引期刊上发表同行评议,对尸体进行的研究,仅限于手术阶段,缺乏临床结果,非实验研究,没有比较物或比较物不足的研究。因此,我们选择了3项研究。关注区域数据库中的LHU5数据,我们观察到住院人数每年增加约90%,住院天数平均减少3天。结论:研究类型和现有证据相当单薄,无论是从临床有效性、安全性还是成本效益方面都没有得到巩固。目前还不可能充分估计这些费用将如何以及在多大程度上转化为实际的临床效益和可能的经济节约。因此,人们认为,这项技术的采用应该完全在研究活动的范围内进行,目的是确定这项技术的所有可能方面(安全-效率-成本/效益)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信