Tito’s Yugoslavia and after

David B. MacDonald
{"title":"Tito’s Yugoslavia and after","authors":"David B. MacDonald","doi":"10.7765/9781526137258.00012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the Second World War and the devastation caused by German and Italian invasion, the Yugoslav peoples had the task of rebuilding their society after it had been torn apart by occupation and fratricidal warfare. The legends surrounding Tito’s Communist Partisans and their war of liberation are well known, immortalised in such works as Milovan Djilas’ Wartime, Fitzroy Maclean’s The Heretic, and Frank Lindsay’s Beacons in the Night. However, as has been seen in the preceding two chapters, contemporary Serbian and Croatian reinterpretations of this period were often negative. The Croatian myth of Bleiburg maintained that the foundations of Tito’s Yugoslavia were constructed on the genocide of Croatian soldiers. For the Serbs, Tito was little more than an ethnic Croat with a grudge against Yugoslavia’s largest and most powerful nation. Both sides presented the lifetime of the SFRY as an era when national identity was suppressed under a barrage of Communist propaganda. National symbols were replaced with ‘Brotherhood and Unity’ and Tito’s own cult of personality. In Tito’s Yugoslavia, ethnic hatreds seemingly smouldered below the surface, manifesting themselves in bizarre and often contradictory ways. The first part of this chapter explores Serbian and Croatian nationalist interpretations of the Yugoslav period, during its rise, its decline, and finally, its Fall. The second examines how propagandists succeeded in making direct connections between past eras of persecution and the contemporary wars of the 1990s. For both sides, the past was nothing more than a template for the present and the future. Past patterns of behaviour, values, morals, paradigms, and ideologies directly determined national goals and priorities in the 1990s.","PeriodicalId":403507,"journal":{"name":"Balkan holocausts?","volume":"287 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Balkan holocausts?","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526137258.00012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After the Second World War and the devastation caused by German and Italian invasion, the Yugoslav peoples had the task of rebuilding their society after it had been torn apart by occupation and fratricidal warfare. The legends surrounding Tito’s Communist Partisans and their war of liberation are well known, immortalised in such works as Milovan Djilas’ Wartime, Fitzroy Maclean’s The Heretic, and Frank Lindsay’s Beacons in the Night. However, as has been seen in the preceding two chapters, contemporary Serbian and Croatian reinterpretations of this period were often negative. The Croatian myth of Bleiburg maintained that the foundations of Tito’s Yugoslavia were constructed on the genocide of Croatian soldiers. For the Serbs, Tito was little more than an ethnic Croat with a grudge against Yugoslavia’s largest and most powerful nation. Both sides presented the lifetime of the SFRY as an era when national identity was suppressed under a barrage of Communist propaganda. National symbols were replaced with ‘Brotherhood and Unity’ and Tito’s own cult of personality. In Tito’s Yugoslavia, ethnic hatreds seemingly smouldered below the surface, manifesting themselves in bizarre and often contradictory ways. The first part of this chapter explores Serbian and Croatian nationalist interpretations of the Yugoslav period, during its rise, its decline, and finally, its Fall. The second examines how propagandists succeeded in making direct connections between past eras of persecution and the contemporary wars of the 1990s. For both sides, the past was nothing more than a template for the present and the future. Past patterns of behaviour, values, morals, paradigms, and ideologies directly determined national goals and priorities in the 1990s.
铁托时期的南斯拉夫及其后
在第二次世界大战和德国和意大利入侵造成的破坏之后,南斯拉夫人民面临着重建被占领和自相残杀的战争撕裂的社会的任务。围绕铁托的共产主义游击队和他们的解放战争的传说是众所周知的,在米洛万·吉拉斯的《战时》、菲茨罗伊·麦克莱恩的《异教徒》和弗兰克·林赛的《夜晚的灯塔》等作品中永垂不朽。然而,正如在前两章中所看到的,当代塞尔维亚人和克罗地亚人对这一时期的重新解释往往是消极的。克罗地亚布莱堡神话坚持认为,铁托南斯拉夫的基础是建立在对克罗地亚士兵的种族灭绝之上的。对于塞尔维亚人来说,铁托只不过是一个对南斯拉夫最大、最强大的国家怀恨在心的克罗地亚人。双方都把南斯拉夫联邦共和国的一生描述为一个民族认同在共产主义宣传的轰炸下被压制的时代。国家象征被“兄弟情谊和团结”以及铁托个人崇拜所取代。在铁托的南斯拉夫,种族仇恨似乎在表面之下闷烧着,以奇怪而经常矛盾的方式表现出来。本章的第一部分探讨了塞尔维亚和克罗地亚民族主义者对南斯拉夫时期的解释,从南斯拉夫的兴起、衰落到最后的衰落。第二部分考察了宣传者如何成功地将过去的迫害时代与20世纪90年代的当代战争直接联系起来。对双方来说,过去只不过是现在和未来的模板。过去的行为模式、价值观、道德、范式和意识形态直接决定了20世纪90年代的国家目标和优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信