Integrity Assessment of Pipelines With Ovality

Fan Zhang, M. Rosenfeld
{"title":"Integrity Assessment of Pipelines With Ovality","authors":"Fan Zhang, M. Rosenfeld","doi":"10.1115/IPC2018-78281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ovality in a pipe results in a stress concentration and may present a pipeline integrity concern. If ovalization is generated during manufacturing or transportation and found during the girth welding process before the pipe is buried, replacement of the oval segment is usually the solution. However, ovalization is sometimes also found in buried pipelines via in-line-inspection (ILI) either before the pipeline is put into service or during regular pipeline maintenance. The mitigation and/or replacement of oval pipes after burial can be expensive. It is vital to identify what constitutes an unacceptable ovality level and to remediate only those that pose a threat of failure during the service life of the pipeline. The existing assessment approaches for oval pipes, such as that in API 579, generally require knowledge of the amount of ovality at zero pressure. However, the ovality of buried pipes usually is only available from ILI runs carried out at a non-zero internal pressure. The internal pressure tends to push the pipe back toward a circular shape, a phenomenon known as re-rounding. As a result, the ILI-reported ovality is smaller than that under zero pressure. Described in this paper is a new approach which can be used to assess the integrity of oval pipe segments based on ovality either as measured with no pressure in the pipe or as reported by ILI conducted at an elevated level of pressure. The approach considers both burst failure and fatigue damage. The accuracy of the approach was verified by finite element analysis (FEA). With the help of this new approach, a general discussion about the threat of ovalization to the integrity of a pipeline is provided. The analysis indicates that ovalization in amounts usually observed does not reduce the burst pressure in most pipelines, but fatigue damage could be a concern. The fatigue damage due to ovalization is sensitive to pipe geometry, amplitude of pressure variation, and the minimum pressure level within the pressure cycles.","PeriodicalId":164582,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: Pipeline Safety Management Systems; Project Management, Design, Construction, and Environmental Issues; Strain Based Design; Risk and Reliability; Northern Offshore and Production Pipelines","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: Pipeline Safety Management Systems; Project Management, Design, Construction, and Environmental Issues; Strain Based Design; Risk and Reliability; Northern Offshore and Production Pipelines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ovality in a pipe results in a stress concentration and may present a pipeline integrity concern. If ovalization is generated during manufacturing or transportation and found during the girth welding process before the pipe is buried, replacement of the oval segment is usually the solution. However, ovalization is sometimes also found in buried pipelines via in-line-inspection (ILI) either before the pipeline is put into service or during regular pipeline maintenance. The mitigation and/or replacement of oval pipes after burial can be expensive. It is vital to identify what constitutes an unacceptable ovality level and to remediate only those that pose a threat of failure during the service life of the pipeline. The existing assessment approaches for oval pipes, such as that in API 579, generally require knowledge of the amount of ovality at zero pressure. However, the ovality of buried pipes usually is only available from ILI runs carried out at a non-zero internal pressure. The internal pressure tends to push the pipe back toward a circular shape, a phenomenon known as re-rounding. As a result, the ILI-reported ovality is smaller than that under zero pressure. Described in this paper is a new approach which can be used to assess the integrity of oval pipe segments based on ovality either as measured with no pressure in the pipe or as reported by ILI conducted at an elevated level of pressure. The approach considers both burst failure and fatigue damage. The accuracy of the approach was verified by finite element analysis (FEA). With the help of this new approach, a general discussion about the threat of ovalization to the integrity of a pipeline is provided. The analysis indicates that ovalization in amounts usually observed does not reduce the burst pressure in most pipelines, but fatigue damage could be a concern. The fatigue damage due to ovalization is sensitive to pipe geometry, amplitude of pressure variation, and the minimum pressure level within the pressure cycles.
椭圆型管道完整性评价
管道的椭圆形会导致应力集中,并可能引起管道完整性问题。如果在制造或运输过程中产生椭圆形,并且在埋管前的环焊过程中发现椭圆形,则更换椭圆形段通常是解决方案。然而,在管道投入使用之前或在管道定期维护期间,通过在线检查(ILI)有时也会发现埋地管道存在卵圆现象。埋后对椭圆形管道进行缓解和/或更换可能非常昂贵。至关重要的是要确定什么构成了不可接受的椭圆度水平,并只对那些在管道使用寿命期间构成故障威胁的部分进行补救。现有的椭圆管评估方法,如API 579,通常需要了解零压力下的椭圆量。然而,埋管的椭圆度通常只能通过在非零内压下进行的ILI运行来获得。内部压力倾向于将管道推回到圆形,这种现象被称为再圆。因此,ili报告的椭圆度小于零压力下的椭圆度。本文描述的是一种新的方法,可用于评估椭圆管段的完整性,该方法基于椭圆度,无论是在管道中没有压力的情况下测量的,还是在高压力水平下进行的ILI报告的。该方法同时考虑了爆裂破坏和疲劳损伤。通过有限元分析验证了该方法的准确性。利用这种新方法,对椭圆化对管道完整性的威胁进行了一般性讨论。分析表明,在大多数管道中,通常观察到的卵化量并不能降低破裂压力,但疲劳损伤可能是一个问题。椭圆化引起的疲劳损伤对管道几何形状、压力变化幅度和压力循环内的最小压力水平敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信