Indonesia's Environmental Law of 2009 and its Administrative Coercion Provisions: A Conceptual Misunderstanding with Large Practical Implications?

L. d'Hondt
{"title":"Indonesia's Environmental Law of 2009 and its Administrative Coercion Provisions: A Conceptual Misunderstanding with Large Practical Implications?","authors":"L. d'Hondt","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2289123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When Indonesian environmental agencies are confronted with violations of the environmental law by industries, they frequently respond either by attempting to prosecute a violator criminally or by facilitating mediation between (alleged) violators and ‘victims’ of the environmental violation. Enforcement within the administrative law scheme is however rarely used, or at least not to the fullest of its possibilities. The paper concludes that this is partially due to the formulation of the provisions on administrative coercion in the Indonesian environmental law. In practice this leave quite some room for confusion regarding the authority and responsibility of the government to swiftly halt violations. Reevaluating the basic concepts that underpin government responses to environmental violations would be beneficial to become more effective in dealing with violations of the environmental law in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":389531,"journal":{"name":"International Administrative Law eJournal","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Administrative Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2289123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

When Indonesian environmental agencies are confronted with violations of the environmental law by industries, they frequently respond either by attempting to prosecute a violator criminally or by facilitating mediation between (alleged) violators and ‘victims’ of the environmental violation. Enforcement within the administrative law scheme is however rarely used, or at least not to the fullest of its possibilities. The paper concludes that this is partially due to the formulation of the provisions on administrative coercion in the Indonesian environmental law. In practice this leave quite some room for confusion regarding the authority and responsibility of the government to swiftly halt violations. Reevaluating the basic concepts that underpin government responses to environmental violations would be beneficial to become more effective in dealing with violations of the environmental law in Indonesia.
印尼2009年环境法及其行政强制条款:一个具有重大现实意义的概念误解?
当印尼的环境机构面对行业违反环境法的行为时,他们的反应通常是试图对违规者提起刑事诉讼,或者促进(被指控的)违规者与环境违法行为的“受害者”之间的调解。然而,很少使用行政法方案内的强制执行,或者至少没有充分发挥其可能性。本文的结论是,这部分是由于印度尼西亚环境法中关于行政强制的规定。在实践中,这给政府迅速制止违规行为的权力和责任留下了相当大的混乱空间。重新评估政府应对环境违法行为的基本概念,将有助于更有效地处理印尼的环境违法行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信