The Impact of Global Human Rights Advocacy on State Practices: A Multi-Country Study

F. Pijoh
{"title":"The Impact of Global Human Rights Advocacy on State Practices: A Multi-Country Study","authors":"F. Pijoh","doi":"10.58812/eslhr.v1i03.93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the influence of international human rights advocacy on state practices in Indonesia and Malaysia. The research uses a mixed methods approach, combining quantitative analysis of human rights indicators and qualitative analysis of case studies and interviews. The findings show successes and challenges in the relationship between advocacy efforts and state behavior in both countries. The quantitative analysis shows improvements in certain areas, such as gender equality in Indonesia and legislative reform in Malaysia, while challenges remain in terms of freedom of expression, religious freedom, and minority rights. The qualitative analysis provides deeper insights, highlighting the important role of advocacy in raising awareness, promoting accountability, and pressuring governments to address human rights violations. However, barriers to effective implementation exist due to political resistance and societal divisions. A comparative analysis between Indonesia and Malaysia shows similarities and differences, with Indonesia showing a greater response to reform and Malaysia showing resistance that limits freedoms. This research contributes to the field by emphasizing the need for context-specific analysis and tailored approaches to address human rights challenges.","PeriodicalId":405973,"journal":{"name":"The Easta Journal Law and Human Rights","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Easta Journal Law and Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58812/eslhr.v1i03.93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of international human rights advocacy on state practices in Indonesia and Malaysia. The research uses a mixed methods approach, combining quantitative analysis of human rights indicators and qualitative analysis of case studies and interviews. The findings show successes and challenges in the relationship between advocacy efforts and state behavior in both countries. The quantitative analysis shows improvements in certain areas, such as gender equality in Indonesia and legislative reform in Malaysia, while challenges remain in terms of freedom of expression, religious freedom, and minority rights. The qualitative analysis provides deeper insights, highlighting the important role of advocacy in raising awareness, promoting accountability, and pressuring governments to address human rights violations. However, barriers to effective implementation exist due to political resistance and societal divisions. A comparative analysis between Indonesia and Malaysia shows similarities and differences, with Indonesia showing a greater response to reform and Malaysia showing resistance that limits freedoms. This research contributes to the field by emphasizing the need for context-specific analysis and tailored approaches to address human rights challenges.
全球人权倡导对国家实践的影响:一项多国研究
本研究探讨国际人权倡导对印尼和马来西亚国家实践的影响。该研究采用混合方法,将人权指标的定量分析与案例研究和访谈的定性分析相结合。研究结果显示了两国倡导努力和政府行为之间关系的成功和挑战。定量分析显示,某些领域有所改善,例如印度尼西亚的性别平等和马来西亚的立法改革,但在言论自由、宗教自由和少数民族权利方面仍然存在挑战。定性分析提供了更深入的见解,强调了宣传在提高认识、促进问责和向政府施压解决侵犯人权问题方面的重要作用。然而,由于政治阻力和社会分歧,有效执行存在障碍。印度尼西亚和马来西亚之间的比较分析显示出相似之处和差异,印度尼西亚对改革表现出更大的反应,而马来西亚则表现出限制自由的抵制。这项研究通过强调需要针对具体情况进行分析和采取有针对性的方法来应对人权挑战,对该领域作出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信