The Use, Effect and Further Development of the Tool of Reflection in Adult Theological Education in Relation to the Formation of Anglican Curates

T. Gerhardt
{"title":"The Use, Effect and Further Development of the Tool of Reflection in Adult Theological Education in Relation to the Formation of Anglican Curates","authors":"T. Gerhardt","doi":"10.1179/1740714114Z.00000000019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Reflection is widely used within the humanities as a tool to improve practice. A review of critical literature on reflection, however, suggests that there are too many varying and conflicting definitions and applications to be a truly reliable tool. The validity of such an argument is critiqued in the analysis of the nature of the relationship between the tutor, learner and outcomes in reflection specific to the field of humanities. This suggests that many factors, not least the responsibility of the learner for learning, contribute to and influence actual outcomes. Reflection as a tool is discussed further in relation to Theological Reflection, which due to its concise parameters offers a more improved measured approach to reflection and the professional development of a specific practice. Theological Reflection under constant improvement in tutor, learner and outcomes is demonstrated to be the best method there is at present to improve professional practice in curates using examples from the authors’ own experience.","PeriodicalId":224329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adult Theological Education","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adult Theological Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/1740714114Z.00000000019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract Reflection is widely used within the humanities as a tool to improve practice. A review of critical literature on reflection, however, suggests that there are too many varying and conflicting definitions and applications to be a truly reliable tool. The validity of such an argument is critiqued in the analysis of the nature of the relationship between the tutor, learner and outcomes in reflection specific to the field of humanities. This suggests that many factors, not least the responsibility of the learner for learning, contribute to and influence actual outcomes. Reflection as a tool is discussed further in relation to Theological Reflection, which due to its concise parameters offers a more improved measured approach to reflection and the professional development of a specific practice. Theological Reflection under constant improvement in tutor, learner and outcomes is demonstrated to be the best method there is at present to improve professional practice in curates using examples from the authors’ own experience.
反思工具在成人神学教育中的运用、效果及进一步发展与圣公会副牧师的形成
摘要反思作为一种改进实践的工具在人文学科中被广泛应用。然而,对反思的批判性文献的回顾表明,有太多不同的和相互冲突的定义和应用,不能成为一个真正可靠的工具。这种论点的有效性在分析导师、学习者和人文学科反思成果之间关系的本质时受到了批评。这表明,许多因素,尤其是学习者对学习的责任,有助于并影响实际结果。反思作为一种工具将进一步与神学反思进行讨论,神学反思由于其简洁的参数,为反思和特定实践的专业发展提供了一种更完善的测量方法。在导师、学习者和结果的不断改进下,神学反思被证明是目前最好的方法,以作者自己的经验为例,提高牧师的专业实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信