The topology of shared-memory adversaries

M. Herlihy, S. Rajsbaum
{"title":"The topology of shared-memory adversaries","authors":"M. Herlihy, S. Rajsbaum","doi":"10.1145/1835698.1835724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Failure patterns in modern parallel and distributed system are not necessarily uniform. The notion of an adversary scheduler is a natural way to extend the classical wait-free and t-faulty models of computation. A well-established way to characterize an adversary is by its set of cores, where a core is any minimal set of processes that cannot all fail in any execution. We show that the protocol complex associated with an adversary is (c-2)-connected, where c is the size of the adversary's smallest core. This implies, among other results, that such an adversary can solve c-set agreement, but not (c-1)-set agreement. The proofs are combinatorial, relying on a novel application of the Nerve Theorem of modern combinatorial topology.","PeriodicalId":447863,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS symposium on Principles of distributed computing","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS symposium on Principles of distributed computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1835698.1835724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

Abstract

Failure patterns in modern parallel and distributed system are not necessarily uniform. The notion of an adversary scheduler is a natural way to extend the classical wait-free and t-faulty models of computation. A well-established way to characterize an adversary is by its set of cores, where a core is any minimal set of processes that cannot all fail in any execution. We show that the protocol complex associated with an adversary is (c-2)-connected, where c is the size of the adversary's smallest core. This implies, among other results, that such an adversary can solve c-set agreement, but not (c-1)-set agreement. The proofs are combinatorial, relying on a novel application of the Nerve Theorem of modern combinatorial topology.
共享内存对手的拓扑结构
现代并行和分布式系统的故障模式并不一定是统一的。对手调度程序的概念是扩展经典的无等待和t错误计算模型的一种自然方式。确定对手特征的一种行之有效的方法是通过其核心集,其中核心是任何在任何执行中都不会失败的最小进程集。我们表明,与对手相关的协议复合体是(c-2)连接的,其中c是对手最小核心的大小。这意味着,在其他结果中,这样的对手可以解决c集协议,但不能解决(c-1)集协议。这些证明是组合的,依赖于现代组合拓扑学神经定理的新应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信